From a social welfare point of view, Minister of Education Wu Ching-chi’s (吳清基) dream to accelerate the nation’s implementation of a 12-year compulsory education system, from the current nine years, should be applauded.
So when his ideal clashes with the fiscal reality and compromises have to be made, many should have gone easy on him, because at least he tried, even though he failed.
However, a well-intended proposal has now turned into a complete blunder and Wu has no one but himself to blame.
Before assuming the ministerial post less than a year ago, Wu was a high school teacher, a university professor and then moved on to serve at the Ministry of Education for decades.
Wu should have known better about the difficulties and controversy surrounding the proposal to implement a 12-year compulsory education system after the current system was established in 1968.
Some question the necessity of adopting a 12-year compulsory system, since the quality of education in the current nine-year system still needs much improvement. Given the same quality of education, what is the point of putting students through three more years of mandatory study where there is limited room for them to benefit?
Improved education quality, therefore, should be viewed as a precondition to a new 12-year system. Most importantly, a 12-year system requires strong financial support and security backed by government coffers. That is the biting reality.
Without thinking about these complications, Wu went ahead and pledged in March that all students entering private high schools, vocational high schools and junior colleges in the coming school year would receive subsidies that would cover the tuition discrepancy they pay for public high schools.
Because of that verbal promise, several private high schools have reportedly accepted about 13,000 students who may not be able to afford the tuition after the Cabinet refused to endorse Wu’s pledge.
Without learning from its first mistake, the ministry, under Wu’s leadership, went ahead again and said that families with an annual income of less than NT$600,000 (US$18,500) would qualify for tuition breaks.
That was also rejected by the Cabinet, which raised the threshold to NT$900,000.
The policymaking process shows that the government handles policies as it sees fit.
Why was the threshold set at NT$600,000? And many angry parents ask: If it can be raised to NT$900,000, who’s to say that figure won’t be changed again? And why is a 12-year mandatory education system so urgent that Wu can’t wait to make his pledge until he has consulted his superiors or called for an inter-ministerial meeting to finalize details?
The public deserves to know the rationale behind the government’s policymaking process instead of being subjected to a single official’s wishful thinking.
The Cabinet should once again look closer into the recent outcry before it is too late to change its formulation of policies.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry