After two years of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the economy has slumped and democracy and human rights have regressed. Taiwan’s national sovereignty has been undermined, our culture has been demeaned and relations between the ruling and opposition parties are tense. Ma’s approval ratings are low and he has lost the trust of the public. After winning 58 percent of the vote in the presidential election two years ago, Ma’s poor performance can be explained in one word — bias.
A president represents the interests of all citizens and this is what makes a head of state different from legislators or local leaders, who only look after the interests of certain groups. The policies promoted by a president should take the public as a whole into account and benefit everyone. Ma, however, has done the exact opposite. He doubles as chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and constantly puts the interests of the KMT before those of the nation. In other words, Ma is more interested in being re-elected that representing the nation.
The biases inherent in the KMT government’s policies are too numerous to list, but the economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) exemplifies them. China constantly stops Taiwan from signing free trade agreements (FTA) with other nations, but it is now suddenly keen to sign an ECFA, even saying it will “concede its own interests” to make a deal possible. The hidden agenda is to subjugate Taiwan by economic means, by ensuring Taiwan’s economy becomes irretrievably dependent on China.
The government is betting the farm on China without a backup plan, a dangerous approach that could spell disaster for Taiwan.
By unilaterally seeking to use China as a springboard to the global economy, the Ma administration is giving many in the international community the impression that Taiwan accepts its status as part of China.
In addition to basing its rule on the ideologically skewed idea of “eventual unification,” the government has also acted against common sense during ECFA negotiations. By establishing a deadline for signing the document, Ma has naively placed Taiwan in a disadvantageous position. At the same time, this approach forces the administration to focus on the agreement’s positive side while trying to play down any negative aspects and labeling anyone who does not agree a closed-minded conservative isolationist.
Only a minority of industries and large corporations stand to gain from an ECFA. It will hurt farmers, workers, salary earners and small and medium enterprises. The resulting economic integration also puts Taiwan at risk of being annexed by China.
Policies such as this deviate so much from the interests of the majority that they have widened the gap between rich and poor over the past two years. An ECFA will accelerate that division and lead to class conflict.
Even more ridiculous, Ma’s fawning over the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) gives the impression of fraternal friendship between the CCP and the KMT. In contrast, the ruling and opposition parties in Taiwan are more divided than ever. With Taiwan’s domestic affairs in such a mess and with China holding to its old plans for Taiwan, the future looks extremely precarious.
Only the Taiwanese can correct Ma’s one-sided policies.
Unfortunately, the legislature currently serves as little more than a rubber stamp for the government and most media outlets have become slavish cheerleading teams for Ma and his administration.
In such circumstances, only the people can turn things around, but to do so, those in the know need to work even harder to show the public how bad things really are.
Lu Shih-hsiang is an adviser to the Taipei Times.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this