Respect for environment
A devastating leak prompted by an explosion at an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico last month means it might take decades for the Louisiana wetlands to recover from an oil spill three times larger than previously thought .
The disaster caused by the oil spill is a nightmare, and calls for immediate action to save threatened areas not only to reduce the environmental and economic impact but also to protect the natural ecology.
US President Barack Obama tried to reassure fishermen and others in the Louisiana area that the government would do whatever it takes for as long as it takes to cope with the oil spill (“Obama reassures as oil spill spreads,” May 4, page 7). However, after much calculation, the extent of the seriousness of this pollution is still unknown.
The US government should pay full attention to the consequences of this catastrophe because the fishing and tourism industries and the ecosystem of the affected areas will suffer severely. Moreover, it might take decades for the polluted areas to recover.
All of us understand that oil is one of the most important energy sources and is indispensable in many industries; nevertheless, the damage caused by leaking oil has prompted people to rethink the impact of offshore oil exploration.
Our natural resources and marine wildlife have been seriously harmed by accidents such as the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
People have searched for alternative energy forms such as solar, wind and geothermal energy since the turn of the century.
This most recent disaster has taught us not only to focus on people’s safety on offshore rigs, but to also put more effort into developing alternative and renewable energy sources.
In conclusion, it is imperative that we take it as our responsibility to protect the Earth. After all, our world cannot afford more damage from disasters such as oil spills, earthquakes, floods and drought.
CLAIRE WU
Taipei County
Pacific Islanders’ history
With reference to your review of my book, Surviving Paradise (“Notes from a very small island,” May 9, page 14), and Bradley Winterton’s doubts about my claim that Taiwanese Aborigines colonized the Pacific Islands, I would like to clarify and support this claim.
It is the orthodox view among linguists, anthropologists and archeologists that the origin point for the colonization of the Pacific Islands was Taiwan. Between 5,000 and 7,000 years ago, the ancestors of the modern Taiwanese Aborigines expanded out of Taiwan into the Philippines, Indonesia, New Guinea and the Solomon Islands, mixed with local populations, and then colonized previously uninhabited islands in Melanesia, Polynesia and Micronesia — including the Marshall Islands.
So modern-day Pacific Islanders and modern-day Taiwanese Aborigines have common ancestors who lived in Taiwan and some of the Taiwanese Aborigines who lived 5,000 to 7,000 years ago were responsible for setting off the expansion that would eventually lead to such feats as establishing a civilization on the remote Easter Island and discovering Hawaii and Madagascar across vast stretches of empty ocean.
One reason most academics agree that Pacific Islanders originated in Taiwan is that the Taiwanese Aborigines speak Austronesian languages related to the languages spoken by Pacific Islanders. The rich diversity of Austronesian languages spoken in Taiwan indicates that the language family developed there for many thousands of years and then, more recently, was carried to other islands like the Marshall Islands.
RSS