From Burmese pythons to pygmy marmosets, there is a roaring illegal trade in animals online. A recent convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species found one rare species — the Kaiser’s spotted newt (an orange and black salamander in the highland streams of Iran) — now numbers fewer than 1,000 adults in the wild because of Internet trading. So what can you find on the Internet? In just one day, I discovered dealers who appear to be selling some of the rarest species on Earth.
PLOUGHSHARE TORTOISE
Within a few hours, I was staring at an advert for one of the world’s most endangered creatures. It read: “Very superb, jumbo size and most of all very rare.”
Only 200 mature ploughshare tortoises survive in the bamboo scrub lands of north Madagascar; the rest, it seems, are online. And what would this pair of 30-year-old tortoises cost? £24,000 (US$37,000), and a trip to Kuala Lumpur: There’s no international shipping.
BURMESE STARRED TORTOISE
It is against the law to remove the critically endangered Burmese starred tortoise from the forests of Myanmar, but I easily found an apparent seller in Bangkok, Thailand. The dealer’s picture features 35 turtles in a laundry basket lined with newspaper and wilted lettuce. Ten years ago, a survey by the Wildlife Conservation Society found few specimens in the wild. They did, however, find a tortoise trader in every village. This seller was asking £320 in cash for each specimen.
BOSC’S MONITOR LIZARD AND BALL PYTHON
One classified advert offered a “snake show” and “horse riding” along with Bosc’s monitor lizards (£70) and ball pythons (£ 75). International law requires that these African species come with permits from their country of origin — conservationists worry that few wild-caught Bosc’s survive to maturity in captivity and supplies are replenished from wild populations. The ad doesn’t mention permits.
PARROTS AND MACAWS
A Google search for pet birds turned up an eight-year old Tucuman Amazon (£450) in Canada. The seller claimed the bird is from the wild, which would make it illegal: After 20,000 Tucumans left Argentina in the 1980s to become pets, international trade in the species was banned in 1990.
ELEPHANT IVORY
In 2008, eBay banned the sale of ivory, finding it impossible to ensure trade was legal. It’s still available online, however. I called one dealer who seemed knowledgeable about the required permits; the same can’t be said of many online sellers. Some nod to legality by claiming their ivory is antique; others don’t bother. On Craigslist I found an “Endangered Species Ivory Neclace” (sic) in California (US$120). The seller claims it’s “circa 1980,” but without a permit, there’s no way to tell.
HAWKSBILL TURTLE
In Japan, artisans began carving hawksbill shells — the only true source of tortoiseshell — in the 1700s, but banned import of the critically endangered sea turtle in 1993. I found what appeared to be a tortoiseshell item on eBay: A “Brand New Takayama Ex-Takahashi Chikudo Model Shamisen Bekko Bachi Plectrum.” It’s a pic for a banjo-like Japanese instrument. The seller in New York promised a “natural material” of premium grade. Price US$370, will ship worldwide.
SHAHTOOSH
It takes the wool from five dead Tibetan antelope to make one shawl. That means you could get about 30,000 luxury garments from the herd estimated to remain in north western Tibet. It’s illegal worldwide to sell the wool, but I found an online dealer in Kashmir claiming to sell shahtoosh shawls along with “fancy wicker baskets.” Price unlisted.
RADIATED TORTOISE
In the wild, the radiated tortoise spends its days munching cactus in the bush lands of southern Madagascar. “Sub zero,” a dealer in Prai, Malaysia, has two that are two-and-a-half years into a life that can last for 100. This pair could outlive the population as a whole: Scientists have predicted it is headed for collapse in the next half century because of habitat loss and the wildlife trade. Price £710 and £1,220, although Sub zero is offering a “mega discount.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.