The world’s largest Internet search engine, Google, recently decided to close its operations in China because it was opposed to China’s demands that it filter searches containing key search words such as “Tiananmen Square massacre,” “Falun Gong” and “Dalai Lama.”
Google’s decision shocked the world, but even more interesting is the fact that we have yet to see pro-unification media outlets within Taiwan take the stance of promoting freedom and criticizing China for harming human rights and freedom of the press.
All we have seen these media outlets do is applaud the Chinese authorities and say Google chose to give up substantial business opportunities for “political purposes,” and that it was not wise for Google to remove itself from the world’s largest market.
These media outlets have also taken pleasure in ridiculing Google’s falling stock prices and talking about how great China’s Baidu search engine is and how much its stocks have overtaken Google’s in value.
On the day Google chose to withdraw from the Chinese market, Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen not only praised Google for making the right decision, he also encouraged Microsoft’s Bing and other companies like Yahoo to withdraw from China. Sarcastic comments even appeared in China’s Chongqing Evening News about how it was not right for China to give Google no choice but to leave China. It is very regrettable that Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) last instructions to uphold democracy seem to have been totally erased from the minds of pro-unification media outlets by the Chinese Communist Party.
Does Google really not care about commercial interests? As one of the world’s largest companies, Google definitely knows what it is doing. The childhood experiences of Sergey Brin, co-founder of Google, in the oppressive totalitarian USSR and the constant spying that underlay its rule are probably some of the main reasons for Google’s withdrawal from China.
The corporate image Google has managed to uphold and the trust it has gained from its users as a result of the decision to leave China are much bigger gains. Two weeks after the company’s withdrawal from China, its stock prices in the US were higher than they were before they left China, while Baidu’s stock price remained flat. It is also worth remembering that it is meaningless to compare Google and Baidu’s stock prices because Baidu’s capital stock is much lower than that of Google’s.
However, Google did not really leave the Chinese market. The company’s other business operations are still running as normal there, and Chinese Internet users can still use the simplified Chinese character version of the Google search engine, although its Web address has been changed to Google’s Hong Kong site.
Unfortunately, Chinese Internet users are still unable to get results for searches that use words like “Tiananmen Square” and “Dalai Lama.” The biggest thing to come out of Google withdrawing its search engine services from China is the way in which the international media has mocked China for its “Great Firewall” while applauding Google for not giving in to China by agreeing to filter search results. Pro-unification media outlets in Taiwan should remember this and strive to uphold democracy.
I applaud Google and would like to urge Internet users to stand up and show their distaste for the way China blocks information and hampers the basic human right of free access to knowledge. I would also like to urge the international media to refuse unreasonable requests from China.
Michael Chen is president of ZiPCOM Corp.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and