Gender equality imperative
For centuries, men have been thought of as the main labor force in the open market as well as in the countryside. As time passed, many women have been gradually taking up jobs to earn money to share the household expenses of the family.
Although women devote themselves to their jobs, they still face unfair treatment in the workplace.
Reading the Taipei Times’ report on women in the workplace (“Women still face discrimination,” March 9, page 2), I have found that the number of career women is rising rapidly, although gender discrimination has still not been eliminated. Gender discrimination is particularly evident when it comes to promotion and pay.
Thanks to our government’s policy on gender equality in employment, women are entitled to more protection in the workplace. In another Taipei Times article it was reported that India’s government decided to reserve a third of all seats in parliament’s upper house for women (“Women’s bill triggers uproar in India,” March 9, page 4). It is evident that many conservative countries have started to take women’s rights and gender equality into account.
However, there are still many policies that limit women’s rights, limiting their achievement in their jobs. Many female professionals and laborers are confronted with prejudice in different workplaces. Occasionally, some are even sexually harassed.
It is thus imperative that all governments take action and enact laws that eliminate these types of discrimination, thereby better protecting female workers on the grounds of justice and humanism.
Steven Chang
Taipei
Cowards should be fired
While reading a Taipei Times article on the refusal to play the national anthem at a national celebration, I was outraged (“DPP furious over refusal to play the national anthem,” April 1, page 3). The abysmally craven cowardice displayed by the organizers of the founding of the Republic of China committee, who lacked the courage to play their own country’s national anthem during a celebration to unveil the year-long celebration’s slogan and logo, was evidently an attempt to appease the sensibilities of the communist Chinese.
I was also sickened by a premonition of what the future holds for people who are such nauseating, abject cowards. I say: “Shame on all of them!”
They should all be immediately fired and replaced. If Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) were still alive, heads would roll without a doubt. Literally. These curs would be killed (or at least severely punished) for their cowardice.
Council for Cultural Affairs Minister Emile Sheng (盛治仁) — who doubles as head of the committee, was reported as saying that he defended the committee’s choice, saying that the National Flag-Raising Song (國旗歌) “was chosen to go along with the ‘light pace’ of the PowerPoint presentation the committee had chosen for the occasion.”
This has to be one of the most laughably and patently ludicrous statements that I have ever seen in print.
It’s purely and simply a load of codswallop and stinking bullshit, emitted by a buffoone like in the Italian La Commedia dell’Arte.
At first, given that the article was published on April 1 — a day traditionally reserved for pranks, buffoonery and tomfoolery — I had originally assumed that Sheng’s statements were the result of an impish and perverse desire to play an April Fool’s joke on the readers of this paper.
I cannot describe the acrid, sinking feeling in my stomach when I realized that this was not the case.
Michael Scanlon
East Hartford, Connecticut
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under