The National Property Administration (NPA) has once again become a target of much criticism after auctioning a 121.3 ping (401m²) plot of state-owned residential land on Feb. 25 for NT$6.02 million (US$194,000) per ping, the second-highest price on record in the country. As history tends to repeat itself, we cannot help but give a bitter smile.
Many still remember how the agency sold a 2,300 ping plot of public land in downtown Taipei to Shin Kong Life Insurance Co for NT$6.38 billion, or NT$2.77 million per ping, four years ago. What happened then? Shin Kong sold the land to Yuanlih Group for NT$10.1 billion two years later. The land had not been developed. By simply paying a little interest and land-value tax, Shin Kong made a profit of more than NT$3.7 billion on the deal, without any Taipei residents benefiting.
The sale triggered a public protest, and public land auctions were suspended as a result. Moreover, the Legislative Yuan passed a resolution temporarily banning sales of more than 500 ping plots. So why is history repeating itself today? Can the problem be resolved by Premier Wu Den-yih’s (吳敦義) temporary suspension of prime public land sales in Taipei, or by adjusting the 500 ping threshold to 300 ping or 400 ping?
We would like to point out that the biggest problem with public land sales lies with the Cabinet, not the NPA, which is merely implementing the government’s land policy. The authority in charge of public land has changed — from the National Property Management Committee under the former Democratic Progressive Party administration to the national land disposal and revitalization supervisory team headed by Vice Premier Eric Chu (朱立倫) — but the misguided idea of treating public land as a commodity remains unchanged. Both the previous and current administrations also lacked a national land policy that is based on public interest and sustainable use.
Whether these land sales stimulate or constrain the housing market, the focus has always been on the transaction, rather than the use, of public land. However, we have to remember that public land plays a different role from that of private land. It has many diversified uses, including providing affordable housing, meeting public infrastructure needs, and protecting and conserving the environment.
The government should not treat precious public land as a fiscal tool. Nor should it sell such land as if it were haggling at a traditional market simply to satisfy the needs of big businesses. Has the government even considered reviewing the nation’s long-suffering land policy?
Aside from selling off these properties, the NPA — an agency under the Ministry of Finance — is merely responsible for land registration. It has no power to manage these assets. A better solution would be a government restructuring that would either place this agency under the Ministry of the Interior or create a new ministry of public land to give the government more opportunity and room to consider how to put these assets to better use. Auctioning these plots of land only leads to real estate speculation, with the public suffering as a result of soaring property prices.
We should also invite the public to participate in the review of national land policy and use, so residents who live nearby can better understand future development projects and make informed decisions. Finding a solution to handling public land will take a lot of time. Let’s start by asking legislators to cancel the NPA’s budget for national land disposal.
Huang Hui-hsin is the convener of the Public Assets Saving Front.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.