Over the recent Lunar New Year holidays, Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) made a special trip to Xiamen in Fujian Province to visit the Zhangpu Development Park for Taiwanese Farmers. This park poses a great threat to Taiwan’s agricultural sector.
Trying to get Taiwanese farmers on its side has been an important part in China’s united-front strategy against Taiwan. Zhangzhou, a city just north of the development park, has worked assiduously to encourage Taiwanese, especially farmers from central and southern Taiwan, to bring their capital, crop and animal varieties, as well as technological and managerial skills, and set up businesses there. The establishment of a development park for farmers to attract Taiwanese businesspeople, farmers and technological know-how is a very clever strategy that has succeeded because of “matchmaking” by retired government officials and disgruntled political hacks from Taiwan.
The Zhangpu development park is located just across the Strait from Taiwan. Many Taiwanese have their family origins here and the local dialect is very similar to the Hoklo, commonly known as Taiwanese. These features made the area the first testing ground for China’s promotion of an experimental cross-strait agricultural cooperative zone.
In April 2006, the development park was established in Zhangzhou City’s Zhangpu County. It included a technological service center, a business development center and six special industrial development zones for flora, fruits and vegetables, tealeaves, fishery and the processing of agricultural and related products, as well as livestock products.
Sixty-eight Taiwanese-owned agricultural companies operate within the park, as well as three individual industrial and commercial households established by Taiwanese farmers. They have invested a total of US$110 million and have an annual production value of 1.5 billion yuan (US$219.8 million).
The park is also introducing almost 200 varieties of high quality Taiwanese species and crops, such as shrimp, red drum, abalone, grouper, beans, tea leaves, high-quality fruit, butterfly orchids and regular orchids.
It covers more than 141,600 hectares, which accounts for two-thirds of the total agricultural land in the entire Zhangpu County. The park is also encouraging the development of more than 30 types of advanced technology like the cross-breeding of Chinese and Taiwanese varieties of shrimp and special packages for fruit and organic goods. The cultivation of butterfly orchids has proven to be a major industry within the park.
The park has an annual production value of flora worth NT$500 million (US$15.6 million) and the flora has been exported to more than 20 western countries.
Taiwanese-owned agricultural businesses have already made US$421 million in foreign exchange from the Zhangzhou region, with an annual export quantity of more than 44,000 tonnes of vegetables, more than 200 tonnes of short necked clam meat, more than 1,150 tonnes of crab meat, more than 3,000 tonnes of products made from ginger and exports of flora that have made as much as US$7 million in foreign exchange.
It is obvious that people setting up businesses in the development park are not only taking Taiwan’s precious resources over there, they are also introducing advanced cultivation techniques and management skills, as well as passing on abundant experience in sales and marketing.
In just a few short years, one single development park for Taiwanese farmers has spurred rapid development of the agricultural industry in China and has increased the foreign exchange earning-power of China’s agricultural products.
This will without a doubt threaten the opportunities for Taiwan to export similar products produced here.
There is reason behind the worries of our farmers and the Taiwanese government should recognize the severity of this problem and adjust the pace of cross-strait agricultural exchange.
Du Yu is a member of the Chen-Li Task Force for Agricultural Reform.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations