While President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administrative team may be in low spirits, this has had no effect on the vigor newly appointed Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Secretary-General King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) has shown in handling party affairs.
Success in the year-end special municipality mayoral elections will directly influence Ma’s re-election bid in 2012. The KMT is already pretty much assured of defeat in Tainan and Kaohsiung. This leaves three municipalities — Taipei, Sinbei City and Taichung — where the KMT can win. Taipei already looks somewhat precarious for the KMT and incumbent Taipei County Commissioner Chou Hsi-wei (周錫瑋) withdrew from the election race for Sinbei City (新北市). The feeling in the KMT seems to be that Vice Premier Eric Chu (朱立倫) should run, but he has so far rejected the idea. For a year, Chou refused to pull out of the election, but things changed when King became involved.
The KMT feels that King is justified in pushing Chou out to promote Chu because it is a small sacrifice for a greater cause. Normally when people refer to a “greater cause,” they refer to the nation and society as a whole, while the “small sacrifice” is that of a political party or the president. The “greater cause” represents overall national interests, while the “small sacrifice” represents local interests.
The distinction between great and small means that it is quite a normal occurrence to promote outstanding local leaders to the central government. In this way, localities may lose a competent leader, but in the greater scheme of things, the nation stands to gain a talented government official. However, King is now doing the exact opposite: He wants to take a county commissioner deemed incompetent by local residents and bring him into the central government. He also wants to take the vice premier, who was expected to bolster central government performance, to return to a local government position. He even wants legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), who gets the best approval ratings in the government, to run in local government elections.
To guard against a terrible loss in the upcoming elections, the KMT has given up on central government administrative matters and put legislative issues on the back burner to focus all its attention on the local elections. In doing so, the party and King have prioritized isolated, local affairs over affairs of national importance.
This does not actually mean the KMT is placing more of an emphasis on localities. What it does mean is that it is focusing all its attention and efforts on assuring victory in local elections, with an eye to Ma’s 2012 presidential campaign.
When the KMT talks about “the greater cause,” it is not referring to the nation, our society or even the party, but to Ma himself. Every decision the KMT makes must be in the interest of Ma and his cronies. King is especially skilled in looking after Ma and his interests. In this atmosphere, the KMT, the nation, Taiwanese citizens and everything else must take a backseat to Ma.
King now has a lot of power and can make the decisions he sees fit on key positions in both the central and local governments. He also determines important laws, their content and procedures, and he wants to draw up a code of conduct for legislators-at-large as if they were a bunch of naughty children. However, it should be noted that legislators-at-large are elected by voters. King, on the other hand, was elected by no one.
Anything that Ma cannot handle, such as policy and personnel matters, King now handles, placing Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) in an extremely awkward position.
Luckily, Wu invented the concept of a “grassroots economy,” which says that the smaller the issues, the more attention the government should pay them. This is good in terms of showing greater care toward the public and Wu is doing a good job at attending to everyday affairs, like accepting the resignation of Lin Tyh-ming (林志明), head of the Ministry of Transportation and Communications’ Directorate General of Highways because of his misinterpretation of a government measure that saw county residents pay NT$8 more than city residents when paying their vehicle fuel charges at convenience stores. If our premier did not pay attention to such issues, how could he even begin to explain his actions to King? At a time when grassroots issues are given such a heavy emphasis, shouldn’t all heads of government responsible for making laws and policies that annoy citizens be replaced?
It really is something to behold when a political party’s secretary-general, who is not accountable to the public, is wielding so much power. Have we turned to a Leninist system, in which the party leads the government? Some people say we have.
In a Leninist system, the position of party secretary-general is the most powerful. Now, Ma is merely a figurehead and, with the party taking priority, King has taken over the government.
This is not even the worst of it. In communist nations, secretaries general are elected by a politburo and competent party members attend politburo meetings. This is a collegiate system and a form of democracy based on collective leadership. However, with Ma now appointing the KMT’s secretary-general, the central standing committee has been undermined.
What’s more, in the past, King was never even slightly interested in joining the KMT, so it is extremely worrying to hear him talk about how much he now respects the party. It is also very worrying because the current setup means that King is subject to fewer counterbalances than a secretary-general in a communist nation, who is subject to a politburo and a party. Taiwan’s system keeps changing and is now suddenly a “super secretary-general system.”
Ma lacks the clout to have a say in anything, Wu concerns himself with trivialities and the KMT secretary-general holds all the power, and focuses solely on short-term election goals. Long-term national policies are being distorted and ignored. This is detrimental to the nation and the people of Taiwan.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations