The tearful announcement by Taipei County Commissioner Chou Hsi-wei (周錫瑋) that he will not run for mayor of Sinbei City (新北市) in the year-end special municipality elections sent shockwaves through Taipei’s political circles. Chou said he would instead support Vice Premier Eric Chu (朱立倫) for the candidacy.
It is almost unheard of for a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) incumbent to pass up the chance for re-election. Chou has made a few errors — nothing too glaring, but he has been a good sight worse than his predecessor, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌). Although Chou’s popularity ratings are similar to those of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), there is strong support for a Chu candidacy within the party. Either Su or DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) would trounce Chou in any election.
Withdrawing his candidacy may not be what Chou himself wanted, and he has probably been under some pressure. Although he has the advantage of incumbency, his support in opinion polls has always fallen far behind other possible candidates, and neither the Presidential Office, the Cabinet nor the KMT think he stands a chance. Placing last in almost every opinion poll, and with the media constantly harping on political shows he has put on in the past, he is looking more and more like a political clown.
Had Chou insisted on running for mayor of Sinbei City, he would have destroyed all his chances with the KMT and his political future. By withdrawing, he will no longer have to go hat in hand, begging for support, and instead the Presidential Office, the government and the party will now have to look to him for assistance. Ma has even said Chou will be “rewarded” in the future, and that would never have happened without his decision to withdraw from the election.
Chou’s decision is also a lesson in democracy for the authoritarian KMT. In the past, nominees had to look to the party center for guidance, rather than voters, when making decisions. No matter how bad their performance, as long as a candidate had the party leadership’s support, or if an incumbent threatened to run as an independent, they would be nominated. In the run-up to the Sinbei election, opinion polls have influenced who has been asked to step down and who has been asked to run, so incumbents can no longer be assured of a chance to run for re-election. All elected officials must now work hard for the public’s approval to have the opportunity to run for re-election.
This does not necessarily mean that the KMT’s nomination process will be either democratic or transparent. A look at Kaohsiung and Tainan, two difficult areas for the KMT, shows that the information coming out from the party as to who will run for mayor is constantly changing. This makes it clear that the KMT leadership is still deciding who is nominated, rather than taking a democratic approach and allowing anyone who is interested to compete for the public’s approval.
In the run-up to the year-end elections, both the KMT and the DPP are faced with an awkward situation where those willing to run have little or no chance of winning, while those who could win have no interest in running. The first stumbling block on the road to victory is finding a way to nominate a winning candidate through democratic procedures. A party whose nomination process ignores democratic procedures will no longer have much of a chance of winning an election.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.