Pressure on Shezi Island
The decision to develop Shezi Island (社子島) in Taipei City as a new Manhattan is an example of short-sighted decision making (“CEPD passes Shezidao development plan,” Jan. 6, page 2). It shows that governments in Taiwan are not aware of, or planning for, the future impact of climate change.
In its Fourth Assessment Report in 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicted that sea levels would rise between 18cm and 59cm by 2100. However, in recent years increased rates of melting in Greenland have led many scientists to believe these estimates are conservative.
Whatever the case, rising sea levels will pose a significant threat to Taipei and other coastal areas in Taiwan in the coming decades. It is essential that governments begin planning for this now.
It may be necessary to construct a barrier at the mouth of the Tamsui River (淡水河) soon to reduce flood risk. There is already a flood control barrier on the Thames in London.
Beefing up infrastructure is essential to reduce the risk of flooding. However, it is also necessary to halt further development in coastal areas that could be subject to inundation and flooding.
Massive development of one of Taipei’s most low-lying and flood-prone areas is a ridiculous idea. The only thing that Shezi Island may have in common with Manhattan in the future is that it will also have been inundated as a result of climate change.
DAVID REID
Sindian, Taipei County
The US’ second nature
Your Jan. 5 editorial “Afghanistan: Opportunity for Taiwan” on support for US military efforts needs a rethink.
For the last 40 years, Afghanistan has been trapped in civil wars and invasions, which are the direct result of the clumsiest interference by the US — either on its own or after choosing the ugliest of proxies to do its dirty work. Everything about this “mission” smells, and much worse.
It was second nature for the US to support the Republic of China when a notorious military government ruled this island. But ever since democracy bloomed in Taiwan, Washington has aided and abetted China in its relentless application of pressure on Taiwanese, resulting in the isolation and strangulation of this country for the sake of crass commercial interests in China and amid near total indifference to Taiwan’s welfare.
Throughout its history, the US has supported tyranny against freedom and has axiomatically retarded progressive change against the numerous thugs it installed as puppets around the world for its own diplomatic, economic and political self-interest.
That Taiwan might become a fall guy amid this litany of lies and deceit, and among Washington’s most disgusting predatory agendas, is totally unworthy of the place.
JOHN HANNA
Taoyuan
The ROC’s Y2K?
Will Taiwan have a “Y1C” computer glitch on Jan. 1, 2011, when the Republic of China (ROC) enters its 100th year? Some are already discussing this issue online.
Mark Spofford dubs the issue “Taiwan’s Y1C problem” on his Pinyin News blog. The year 1912 is the founding date of the ROC, of course, and since this year is year 99 in ROC parlance, next year will mark year 100.
Will the extra digit cause headaches for Taiwan’s computer systems handling bank transfers, university tuition, insurance premiums, medical records and driver’s license applications?
Some people say any Y1C problem might promote more debate about the relevance and practicality of the ROC calendar.
The countdown to 2011 — or year 100 — has already begun.
Will these problems, if any, be fixed in time?
DAN BLOOM
Chiayi
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations