The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) are speeding up their selection of candidates for mayoral elections in the nation’s five special municipalities later this year.
The DPP has two strategies. In Taipei City, Taipei County and Taichung City, where its chances of winning are small, the party plans to appoint candidates. In Tainan and Kaohsiung cities, where its chances are good, the DPP will let party members register their candidacy before deciding the final candidate through opinion polls, perhaps in combination with primaries.
In Tainan and Kaohsiung, several people are already in the running, while the party’s Central Executive Committee is debating whether to include voting by party members.
The DPP’s problem with nominal party members has long been criticized by voters. The party’s headquarters and local branches must know who is paying the party fees for the large number of dummy members. DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was pressured by public opinion to deal with the issue after her appointment in 2008, but finally let it rest. If she thinks she can continue to ignore the problem thanks to favorable results in the Dec. 5 elections, she is probably misjudging many independent voters, of which there are many more in urban areas than in the countryside.
The DPP may define itself as a democratic party, but for many years it has allowed a few politicos who lack democratic understanding to keep their dummy members. They are basically gang leaders, and their dummy members have no opinions of their own. This is causing serious damage to Taiwan’s democratic development. It must be dealt with swiftly and the time to do that is now.
I can only hope that DPP members and members of the public with a good understanding of democracy will support Tsai in carrying out wide and bold reforms.
The biggest enemy is often that within. How to handle internal conflict while maintaining unity in public is key to the DPP’s ability to battle the KMT in both the special municipality mayoral elections and the 2012 presidential election. This internal conflict comes mainly from influential opportunists, radicals and factional leaders. Such politicos exist in all political parties and they are often the cause of party splits.
I am afraid it will be difficult for Tsai to resolve these internal conflicts by herself. The timely establishment of a pan-green alliance is the most urgent task at hand if the DPP wants to function as a constructive counterweight and become a catalyst for necessary democratic reform while at the same time preventing selfish politicos from hurting party unity.
Only a united party for democracy, freedom, human rights and the rule of law is capable of safeguarding Taiwanese sovereignty and leading the public toward a bright future. I hope the KMT will also initiate reform in this direction. However, if pan-blue supporters continue to tolerate Ma’s leadership style, which has centralized control of the Presidential Office, Executive Yuan and the KMT in his hands without any effective counterweight, democratic reform belongs to a distant future.
In any case, so long as the majority of the DPP’s membership is not independent, primaries involving voting party members are out of the question, both because it is undemocratic and because it goes against the will of many of the independent voters who will be key in the elections later this year.
Andrew Cheng is a researcher in the Institute of Biomedical Sciences at Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under