Policy works. Recovery happens. However, there is a price to be paid. That may turn out to be the message of next year.
One key underlying theme is shaping the world economy. That is the shift in the balance of economic and financial power. The countries that succeed in this shift will fit into one of three categories. They will have the financial resources, such as China or, say, Qatar. They will have natural resources, including water, energy and commodities and will include the likes of Brazil, Canada and many countries across Africa. The third group will be those that have the ability to adapt and change and, in my view, will include the US and the UK.
While this is the longer-term shift we should be aware of, there are more immediate factors also impacting next year’s outlook — the impact of debt and deleveraging in the West and exit strategies following the huge policy stimulus unveiled over the last year. Thus the outcome next year depends on the interaction between the fundamentals, policy and confidence. Of these, confidence is the hardest to call. It may well turn out more positive.
The fundamentals and policy issues are more clear cut. The crisis was triggered by both a systemic failure in the financial system and by an imbalanced global economy. Both need to be fixed. Rebalancing implies the West becomes relatively poorer, spending less and saving more, and that high-surplus regions, such as the Middle East and East Asia, do the opposite.
The trouble is, in many cases, this is not the natural response to a crisis. Indeed, across Asia, saving more — not less — is the natural reaction to a crisis. Hence, there is a need for Asia to deepen its social safety nets, provide help to small and medium-sized firms, and deepen and broaden its bond markets. All of these are possible, but take time.
Guessing whether the shape of the recovery will be a U, V or W, while important, overlooks a key point. Levels matter. The world economy is US$61 trillion in size, with the US accounting for US$14.4 trillion, Japan US$4.7 trillion and China US$4.4 trillion. The West accounts for two-thirds of the world economy. If the West is not booming, the world will not boom and there is no way the West is going to boom. The old model is broken.
Savings will not flow uphill from Asia and the Middle East to fuel debt binges in the West. This spells change. The US consumer faces sluggish wages, high unemployment, house prices well off their peak and worries about pensions.
As a result, it will be an insipid recovery in the West and we expect the global economy to grow 2.7 percent next year after a 1.9 percent fall this year. This is a modest recovery, particularly when one thinks how much has been thrown at the problem, but within this, the strongest growth rates will be seen across emerging economies, particularly Asia, Africa and the Middle East.
The pace and scale of change and the catch up potential is huge. Moreover, Western firms and savers are continuing to look to invest in these faster-growing, lower-cost economies. We forecast Asian growth accelerating to 7 percent next year from 4.5 percent this year, with domestic demand-driven economies, such as China, India and Indonesia, growing by 10 percent, 7.5 percent and 5.5 percent respectively.
There are challenges, however, particularly on policy that has driven much of the rebound over the last year. The global policy stimulus has been sizable, synchronized and successful. Low interest rates, however, mean that, as in the boom, financial markets are not pricing for risk. Meanwhile, huge fiscal stimulus has added to worries about the implications. Thus, there are already calls for policy to be tightened.
In the West, policymakers need to tread carefully. Premature policy tightening would be disastrous. For them inflation is not the problem. Low interest rates need to remain in place for some time.
Across the emerging world, the challenges are different. Some countries are seeing asset price inflation and fear the consequences of rising commodity prices. There is a policy dilemma, however, for many countries. If emerging economies, such as India or South Korea, raise rates, then they are likely to see capital inflows, fueling domestic asset prices, but if they do not raise rates, then domestic asset prices, particularly equity and property prices, will rise anyway. Eventually those economies seeing stronger domestically driven growth will raise rates. A key lesson is the need to set monetary policy to suit domestic needs.
The last leg of the policy and rebalancing debate is currencies. Expect to see more countries increase their currency reserves, both as a precautionary measure in case there is another crisis and also because of intervention to ensure competitiveness.
Although countries are worried about the US dollar, they are reluctant to sell it aggressively, lest it trigger the crisis they fear. I call it passive diversification. As reserves rise, expect to see less and less allocated to the US dollar. The key next year will the yuan. Gradualism dictates China’s currency policy. From this spring we expect to see appreciation, albeit at a gradual pace. As China moves, others will follow.
A salient lesson of recent years for all economies is that the fundamentals matter. Whether it was the financial crisis itself, or the recent problems in Dubai, one lesson is that if something does not happen immediately, this does not mean that it will not happen at all.
Markets that are out of line with long-term trends or economies that appear imbalanced should send alarm bells ringing.
Whatever happens, however, it is important not to lose sight of the longer-term shift in the balance of power. This has already begun. It has a long way to go.
Gerard Lyons is chief economist at Standard Chartered PLC.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under