The annual bonus for employees at state-run CPC Corp, Taiwan (CPC) was originally set at 4.6 months, but was cut to two months after the company’s poor performance last year. In response, CPC’s trade union joined forces with the unions at five other state-run enterprises to organize a protest involving more than 1,000 members outside the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA), saying it was wrong to punish CPC employees as the company only lost money because it followed government policy.
This is a decades-old problem. Economic ministers have never resolved the issue by applying a simple and clear cut set of assessment standards because their lust for power leaves them wanting to make their own decisions. This has perpetuated the problem. If the Control Yuan wanted to shoulder its responsibilities, it would deal with the issue instead of procrastinating and wasting resources.
The problem is quite easy to solve. As state-run enterprises often bear political responsibilities, it is difficult to assess their results based on normal profitability standards, and a different approach is needed. Applying economic theory, the four main production factors are land, labor, capital and entrepreneurship. Using the production capacity of these production factors we can evaluate the efficiency of state-run enterprises by, on one hand, disregarding profits, and, on the other, stimulating more efficient use of resources.
Using this approach, we can create a formula by which the annual production of a state-run company is divided by land, capital and labor — entrepreneurship can be excluded because it doesn’t change, and capital can be replaced by assets. This gives us three types of productivity which — by calculating the simple or weighted average — give us total factor productivity.
If it is difficult to determine which kind of average is better, the value of the three productivity factors can be calculated and directly divided by aggregate production. This allows a comparison between this year’s and last year’s productivity, which will show the growth rate. If it exceeds past economic growth, the results are good, which could justify a higher annual bonus. If not, the bonus would be smaller or witheld. This would make state-run enterprises value the use of land, capital and labor while avoiding the problem of redundant staff or idle land or assets.
One problem is whether aggregated production should be calculated using total market value or total production. As total market value is affected by government policy, it should be total production.
The company may produce many kinds of products, but they can be added together. A related problem is that calculating production effectivity using total production could result in state-run enterprises boosting production to improve their “effectivity” and maybe even sell their production surplus overseas at low prices. This requires complimentary measures to guarantee that such behavior does not affect profits.
With the help of a few accountants and economic experts, I could give the ministry a clear set of regulations for this simple and feasible method — I first suggested this kind of method 18 years ago. It offers a way to objectively evaluate the results of state-run enterprises and offer reasonable annual bonuses, and it creates incentives for improving efficiency. Twenty years later, the problem with employee bonuses at state-run enterprises rumbles on.
If this is what the MOEA’s administrative efficiency amounts to, how can we hope for government efficiency? The government is always talking about how ready it is, so let’s see the ministry follow suit.
Tu Jenn-hwa is an associate professor at National Taiwan University’s Graduate Institute of National Development.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations