The US went to great lengths to prevent a Soviet backlash as the Berlin Wall fell, playing down the joyous occasion as “just another step” toward the crumbling of communism in Eastern Europe, said retired general Brent Scowcroft, the top White House adviser at the time.
While the world celebrated the fall of the Berlin Wall on Nov. 9, 1989, the White House was concerned that the rapidly unfolding events could prompt then general secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Mikhail Gorbachev into a crackdown on the reformist movement in Eastern Europe, said Scowcroft, who was then-US president George H.W. Bush’s national security adviser.
“What we were all worried about was that if we gloated over what was happening, it could produce a reaction from the Soviet Union. So we wanted to downplay the whole issue as a step forward for everybody, but not gloat,” Scowcroft said.
In an exclusive interview to mark the 20-year anniversary of the historic event, Scowcroft, 84, provided a view from inside the White House on the Wall’s collapse, the debate about reunifying Germany and the lessons learned since the end of the Cold War.
As change swept through Eastern Europe, there was a great deal of concern that Gorbachev would be backed into a corner or forced out of office by hardliners in Moscow, moves that could have reversed the Kremlin’s support for reform, he said.
“Almost immediately we started to worry because Gorbachev indicated a great sense of unease of what was going on,” Scowcroft said. “That made us worry. So it was sort of a mixed reaction.”
After the Berlin Wall came down, talk shifted quickly toward discussion of unifying Germany. The Bush administration would back then German chancellor Helmut Kohl’s plan to reunify against the wishes of allies Britain and France, following a hefty debate among Bush’s advisers.
Then-US secretary of state James Baker favored the idea. Scowcroft acknowledges he was one of the skeptics.
“I was nervous about the whole thing and didn’t want us to get out in front on issues of German unification because it was such a sensitive subject and the Germans themselves were divided about it, and I knew that the British and French were opposed to it — not to mention the Russians,” Scowcroft said.
The following December, Bush and his advisers met with Kohl to hear the German leader’s plans to reunify. It was then that Bush decided to get behind unification, ending the internal White House deliberations.
“That was it and I think it turned out to be absolutely on the mark,” said Scowcroft, who today runs the Washington-based international business consulting firm he founded.
He will be part of the US delegation headed to Berlin this month to mark the demise of the Berlin Wall.
Bush had sought assurances that Kohl was committed to unifying Germany under NATO. Gorbachev wanted a neutral Germany. Scowcroft said he was worried Kohl would yield to Gorbachev’s demands and unite Germany at “any price,” while marginalizing the US desire to keep Germany in the alliance.
“I was concerned that he might, not out of any evil design, but just because his responsibility was Germany and he might feel he had to pay any price for a unified Germany,” Scowcroft said.
The fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of communism marked not only the transformation of Europe, but it was also a transition for the US into the world’s only superpower, with all the benefits and burdens.
The US has endured some hard lessons in that role, Scowcroft said. NATO expansion into what was once the Soviet sphere of influence and the 2002 US withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty with Moscow led to a souring of US-Russian relations “that could have been avoided,” he said.
“One of the mistakes we made, and it was gradual, was that we forgot that for Russia this [the end of the Cold War] was a very different kind of experience and however we try to say ‘it’s a new era, it’s a bright era for everybody,’ for the Russians it was deep humiliation,” Scowcroft said. “It wasn’t done to humiliate the Russians at all. It was done for worthwhile purposes, but it ignored very important factors that have risen to haunt us now.”
Scowcroft said the powerful US position in the world is comparable to the Roman Empire, but that times have changed and “we found that you can’t use that power the way you used to. It doesn’t work and I think we are still very much on the learning curve.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations