Museum is misguided
I truly do not understand why or how the National Palace Museum could possibly turn down an offer for two bronze animal heads (“National Palace Museum turns down famed bronzes,” Oct. 8, page 1).
After all, by accepting the two pieces, the museum would be bringing these bronzes back into the loving embrace of the Middle Kingdom’s bosom.
It would be a truly magnificent and wonderful act of supreme patriotism to rescue these objets d’art from the greedy, rasping red-haired barbarians. Such an act of patriotism would do wonders to reverse the reigning sentiment of resentment in China brought on by the centuries of humiliation caused by foreigners, including the plundering of such treasures as the two bronzes in question. I would think that any patriotic Chinese would jump at the chance.
One must never forget that, according to the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) own mythology … er … I mean ideology, the officials currently in control of the “Republic of China” (ROC) are the sole legitimate governing authority for all of China, including Tibet and parts of Mongolia.
Ergo, in their capacity of sole legitimate rulers of all China, the KMT would have every right to take possession of these two bronze pieces and the other pieces in the Pierre Berge-Yves Saint Laurent collection also.
After all, better that these priceless artifacts should be in the hands of the only rightful rulers of China, as opposed to those of the filthy “Communist Bandits.” Or have I overlooked something? Has the grand, dialectical current of history passed me by? Has the “song” changed so much?
Perhaps what I write is ludicrous, but it is no more risible than the pathetic excuse offered by the museum that “the artifacts do not fit its collection.” What stupendous bilge.
Neither can I accept museum director Chuo Kung-hsin’s (周�? claim that the museum had to follow professional ethics and reject any artifacts that were controversial, of unknown origin, or of contraband nature. That’s a load of cowardly, hypocritical tripe.
There can be no doubt whatsoever as to the origin of these bronze pieces. They were pilfered, but they were pilfered from China. To bring them back to China seems to me the ethical thing to do. And since the ROC lays claim to being the sole legitimate governing authority for all of China, it seems only justified that the bronze pieces be welcomed with open arms by the KMT.
MICHAEL SCANLON
East Hartford, Connecticut
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs