In voting George Papandreou’s Socialists back into power, Greeks bucked a Europe-wide trend currently favoring the political right that is likely to be capped by a Conservative victory in Britain next year. But in terms of issues that most influenced voter choices, Greece’s general election seems to have largely followed the pattern of other European polls.
The common picture conjured by recent elections in Germany and Portugal, by Ireland’s referendum on the Lisbon treaty and by June’s European parliamentary elections shows national electorates alarmed by international economic storms raging beyond their control. Their response, broadly speaking, has been a vote for stability and familiar faces — and the least amount of financial pain possible.
Greece’s expected deficit this year of 6 percent of GDP, its ballooning national debt and rising joblessness mirrors, in only slightly exaggerated form, the problems facing many of the EU’s 27 member states. The Socialists’ promises to raise taxes on the better-off, protect jobs and launch a 2.5 billion euro (US$3.7 billion) stimulus package were preferred to the outgoing government’s insistence on tough austerity measures.
Nor can Papandreou be easily portrayed as a fresh face wielding a new broom. A former foreign minister, he hails from a political dynasty reaching back generations; his father served two terms as prime minister. His big idea for dealing with Brussels, which views Athens as a chronic offender of eurozone rules, is an old-fashioned-sounding three-year plan that will supposedly balance the books.
LESS SUCCESSFUL
Last month’s elections in Portugal saw another center-left leader, Prime Minister Jose Socrates, fighting less successfully to stem the rightward tide. Although the Socialist party chief held on to power, voters clipped his wings, leaving him heading a minority administration. Their expectation appears to be that he will steer the country through a deepening crisis in the public finances without taking undue risks.
As in the EU parliamentary elections, and in past national elections in the Low Countries and Eastern Europe, militant fringe parties did well in Portugal at the expense of the larger, more established groupings. Big winners were the right-wing Popular party, which came third overall, and the Left Block, an alliance of former Marxists recalling Germany’s Die Linke (The Left).
Portuguese apathy also reflected pan-European trends. Disillusionment with a lack of policy choices from main parties led 40 percent of the electorate to stay home.
Chancellor Angela Merkel’s powerful showing in last month’s German election suggested to many analysts that voters interested in stability and continuity at a time of global uncertainty were inclined to invest greater confidence in conservative politicians. In short, capitalism’s crisis was best dealt with by pro-capitalists. At the grassroots level there was no real stomach for a fight and no ideological base from which to mount one.
END OF SOCIALISM
In France, where a right-wing president, Nicolas Sarkozy, dominates and the divided Socialist opposition is in disarray, author and thinker Bernard-Henri Levy rattled cages last summer by declaring the end of socialism.
Asked if the French Socialist party could survive, he said: “It is already dead. No one, or nearly no one, dares to say it. But everyone, or nearly everyone, knows it.”
A key factor in the advance of the Right is said to be the way, like former British prime minister Tony Blair, it has stolen its opponents’ political clothes and launched a determined occupation of the center ground where most voters live. To this end, center-right parties such as Merkel’s Christian Democrats endorse “socialized” healthcare, welfare benefits, industry bailouts and environmental causes, while simultaneously promising prudent, cost-effective governance and lower taxes.
Katinka Barysch of the Center for European Reform said that, broadly speaking, Europeans primarily wanted “economic competence” in their leaders. But this did not necessarily translate into support for the Right, she said.
“People are not in revolutionary mood, but at the same time, they have no particular trust in any particular party or political force ... there is a sense of realism about what is possible. If somebody promises more, they don’t believe it. They’re looking for the tried and tested,” she said.
As usual, EU holdout Norway seems impervious to continental trends. In polls last month, Labour party leader and Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg won a notable re-election victory. His achievement may be linked to Norway’s oil and gas riches. In Oslo, it seems, their biggest problem is what to do with the US$400 billion surplus currently stuffed in the nation’s offshore piggy bank. Now there’s a dilemma.
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry