After churning on for months, the debate over what the US and its allies should do in Afghanistan seems to have solidified into three arguments:
• Get out: Afghanistan was a graveyard for the British in the 19th century, for the Russians in the 20th century and is not worth the cost to the US in blood and treasure in the 21st century. Threats by al-Qaeda terrorists can be met closer to home.
• Go all-in: A retreat from Afghanistan would damage US standing as the world’s most powerful nation and therefore it should pour in troops, arms and money to defeat the terrorists and insurgents and establish a viable government in Kabul.
• Either get out or go all-in, but don’t seek halfway measures that are likely to fail, as in Vietnam where the US tried to win a limited war with troops operating under restrictive rules of engagement and where the US gave ineffective aid to the South Vietnamese government.
These arguments, or variations of them, are being made before US President Barack Obama and will confront him with a stark choice that could make or break his presidency. Obama has said the conflict in Afghanistan is “a war of necessity,” not a “war of choice.”
Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said on TV after Obama’s meeting with his key advisors last week that it would take several weeks before a decision was made.
“I would remind you,” he said, “that the [former US president George W.] Bush administration, when they were deliberating whether or not to surge forces into Iraq, took about three months to come to that conclusion.”
The latest poll by the reputable Pew Research Center shows that US support for keeping troops in Afghanistan has slipped to 50 percent, with 43 percent saying the troops should be removed. Republicans favor keeping troops in Afghanistan, Democrats removing them and independents almost exactly mirror the overall public position.
The US commanding officer in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, has delivered his assessment to Obama and summarized it to an audience in London last week.
“The situation is serious, and I choose that word very carefully. I would add that neither success nor failure for our endeavor in support of the Afghan people and government can be taken for granted. My assessment and my best military judgment is that the situation is, in some ways, deteriorating, but not in all ways,” he said.
McChrystal pointed to the construction of roads, provision of clean water, access to healthcare, children in school and access to education for women.
He added, however: “A tremendous number of villagers live in fear, and there are officials who either cannot or do not serve their people effectively. Violence is on the increase.”
“We need to reverse the current trends, and time does matter. Waiting does not prolong a favorable outcome. This effort will not remain winnable indefinitely and nor will public support,” he said.
“The cruel irony,” he concluded, “is that, in order to succeed, we need patience, discipline, resolve and time.”
Two columnists in the New York Times reflected the split in the US over Afghanistan. David Brooks, a moderate conservative, wrote that there are “realistic choices for America’s Afghanistan policy — all out or all in, surrender the place to the Taliban or do armed nation-building. And we might as well acknowledge that it’s not an easy call. The costs and rewards are tightly balanced.”
The next day, Bob Herbert, a liberal, wrote: “Americans are tired of the war.”
“After the long, sad experience in Iraq, and the worst economic shock since the Depression, they are not up for extended combat and endless nation-building in Afghanistan,” he said.
He urged the president to “start bringing the weary troops home.”
Richard Halloran is a freelance writer based in Hawaii.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry