Recent mishaps involving build-operate-transfer (BOT) projects have sparked a debate about the growing risks the private sector faces when participating in public infrastructure projects, but it is too early for a verdict.
On Tuesday, Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) chairwoman Nita Ing (殷琪) stepped down from her post, paving the way for much-needed government support for the company, which has more than NT$70 billion (US$2.16 billion) in accumulated losses.
On Wednesday, city councilors in Kaohsiung urged the government to take over the debt-ridden mass rapid transit system there, which is losing NT$250 million a month and is likely to incur nearly NT$6 billion in losses by the end of the year.
On the same day, the Taipei City Government said it might terminate a BOT contract it signed with the Farglory Group in 2006 for the construction of the Taipei Dome after 18 years of planning. The announcement came in response to a Control Yuan warning.
These BOT troubles are just some of the indications in recent years that private firms are feeling the pain of a fragile state of public-private relations. Three years ago, the government threatened to terminate its electronic toll collection contract with Far Eastern Electronic Toll Collection over a dispute concerning service fees.
The BOT model is relatively new in Taiwan compared with other countries and the government did not enact the Act for Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects (促進民間參與公共建設法) until 2000.
The advantage of a BOT system is to bring private-sector efficiency to the construction and management of public infrastructure. The recent troubles have raised doubts about the model’s viability, but what has made private investors even uneasier is the government’s handling of BOT projects.
Prior to her resignation, Ing questioned the government’s “consistency and credibility” in its support of the nation’s first BOT project.
In an interview with the Chinese-language Commonwealth Magazine, Ing said working with the government was the biggest risk the rail project faced.
Meanwhile, Farglory chairman Chao Teng-hsing (趙藤雄) said he was so disappointed by the city government that he has sworn off public infrastructure projects.
Their criticism took aim at the betrayal of the spirit of BOT — a healthy public-private partnership. The mutual trust that BOT projects require between the private and public sectors has evaporated. If the government wants the model to be successful, it must stop making the same mistakes.
What we have learned from recent disputes is that the BOT model is not suitable for all public construction projects — especially transportation projects. We have also learned that our concept of the BOT model remains ambiguous, which complicates risk-sharing between the public and private sectors. Moreover, the BOT model needs to be allowed to adapt to the changing business environment.
However, critics who argue that Taiwan should abandon the BOT model should consider the problems of government inefficiency and poor-quality construction.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under