For almost three decades, China’s economic growth has been packaged and promoted into something of mythical proportions.
At the same time, China has transformed from the “world’s factory” into the “market of the world.”
The spending power of China’s consumers has increased, and with the financial crisis now gripping economies worldwide, some say that China will be the savior of the global economy.
China’s economic growth is a subject of profound exaggeration.
Few delve into the true state of the Chinese economy, with most people subscribing to an illusion.
This has led businesses to adopt poor investment strategies and the government to formulate a dangerous strategy of opening up to China that places the Taiwanese economy in peril.
After major reforms were introduced in the late 1970s, government figures have reported double-digit growth almost every year, turning the Chinese economy into the world’s third-largest behind the US and Japan.
This status is not in dispute, but the importance and effects of constant, high-level growth have been exaggerated and misinterpreted in telling the saga of a wonder economy.
Taiwan also experienced strong economic growth for several decades.
This is commonly referred to as an economic “miracle” and, together with South Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore, Taiwan was one of the Four Asian Tigers. This economic “miracle” can be described and explained through objective data, and it is substantiated by greatly improved living standards and average wealth.
But does China’s growth stand up to equally strict scrutiny?
This has long been a topic of interest in international economic circles.
Some renowned economists have said they do not believe China’s statistics. Nobel economics laureate Paul Krugman has said that reading Chinese economic growth data is like reading a science fiction novel, while Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Lester Thurow has wondered if Chinese economic officials themselves have the faintest idea of the nation’s true growth figure.
Cheng Xiaonong (程曉農), the deputy president of the Center for Modern China at Princeton University, has said that China’s economy has very serious problems, but that the outside world has been kept in the dark by erroneous information released by the Chinese government — as well as the fear of some Chinese economists to speak the truth.
Some media outlets have published data that helps expose the sham involving China’s growth figures.
First, the Chinese government insists that there is hope of growth reaching 8 percent this year, yet according to official data, in the first eight months of this year, Chinese exports dropped by 22.2 percent, while foreign direct investment decreased by 17.5 percent.
Chinese officials also said that at some point this year the rate of change in industrial production would increase over last year. However, power consumption is dropping.
Further, China’s National Bureau of Statistics has announced that China’s GDP for the first half of this year was 13.98 trillion yuan (US$2.05 trillion), but data from China’s 31 provinces, cities and autonomous regions put the figure at 15.38 trillion yuan, a difference of 1.4 trillion yuan, or approximately 10 percent.
Who is wrong? Are the central government’s statistics faulty or are local governments exaggerating growth to win approval from Beijing? Either way, it is impossible to have faith in official Chinese statistics.
Gordon Chang (章家敦) said in his book The Coming Collapse of China that China’s government issues false economic statistics, the nation’s banks are plagued by massive bad loans and Chinese society is unstable. He offers dire predictions for China’s future.
The situation in China is complex and it is hard to say with any certainty that it will “collapse,” but we do know that beneath the exaggerated growth figures, tensions are increasing unabated between inland and coastal areas, between urban and rural areas, between peasants, workers and the rising urban middle class and between ethnic minorities and Han Chinese.
There is also a burgeoning market for counterfeit goods, a mass of tainted products and food and pervasive official corruption.
From all this it is safe to say that China is in a lot of trouble, and that even if economic collapse can be avoided, domestic problems are bringing the country closer to the tipping point.
Faced with a China on the verge of instability, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration remain indifferent to — or are intentionally ignoring — the hard facts. They have instead adopted policies making Taiwan dependent on China.
This level of dependence will compromise Taiwanese interests if and when things start to devolve in China.
Resigning oneself to a miserable fate as the Ma administration continues its dance with the devil, however, is not an option. The real problem is what must happen next.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry