The boys have class
Just wanted to convey my heartfelt good wishes to the little league team of Taiwan. If it were a world where dreams come true, for me the game the Kuei-Shan team won would have been a tie with the team from Reynosa, Mexico, because my wife and daughter and I lived for many years just 16km from Reynosa in McAllen, Texas.
We saw the many hardships the boys had to conquer and were so proud of them. When two teams represent their countries with such class and sportsmanship it makes an old man like me hope there is a better future for mankind. Give those boys a big hug and a great welcome — they did themselves proud.
JOE CASTRO
Orange Grove, Texas
Diplomatic game theory
The visit of the Dalai Lama is a plus to Taiwan, and China and Tibet as well. In the jargon of game theory, this game of three players — Taiwan, China and Tibet — has not reached a final solution yet. There is enough room for improvement over the current difficult situation for each party.
By allowing the Dalai Lama to visit Taiwan — albeit with a lot of bluffs and drama — China has quite a bit to gain from being more tolerant regarding Tibet. This is expected of a large country like China if it is to be respected.
It is well known that the Tibetan Plateau is the origin of many major rivers in Asia including the Yangtze, Yellow, Ganges and Mekong rivers. In this regard, Tibet is more of a common resource like the North or South Pole, which ought to be shared by all the people on the planet. In fact, about half of the world’s population depends on Tibet’s water supply. The sovereignty of Tibet needs to be handled with extreme care. This visit certainly adds weight in Tibet’s favor.
Taiwan benefits from the visit too: The image and the fact that Taiwan is a different country are again enhanced. Kudos to Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊) and the heads of the seven counties and cities in southern Taiwan for their invitation. Without a doubt, Tibet, and perhaps Taiwan, are gaining a better rapport with the world community, as the Dalai Lama is such a charismatic religious leader that he draws crowds wherever he goes. Not surprisingly, the visit has increased the flexibility of the solution set to the Taiwan-China-Tibet problem.
How far can we push the envelope? What is the line that cannot be crossed for China? Only time can tell. Even though we are walking a tightrope now, the visit is a step in the right direction.
YANG CHIN-WEI
Chiayi
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with