No sense of the mission
Of all the management failures discussed since the Typhoon Morakot debacle, several have gone virtually unmentioned. I’ll address just one.
The most glaring seems to be that a sense of the mission is deficient. “Sense of the mission” is a concept that is supposed to ensure that the men can complete the mission even if there are communication problems between the men in the field and higher-ups elsewhere.
Sun Tzu (孫子) spoke of it when he wrote that leaders in the field are often more aware of battlefield needs than the emperor is; in such cases they are obligated, if need be, to disregard the emperor’s instructions and act on their own initiative.
In the US military, the sense of the mission extends down to the level of sergeant.
I have been told that Taiwanese extend it only to the level of lieutenant, though recent behavior indicates that there’s too much top-down control and too little sense of the mission at any level.
In particular, two failures really stick in my craw.
One was the claim that, because a bridge was out and it was impossible to get heavy equipment into the area, hundreds of people threatened with death had to be left in the pouring rain for three days.
When people are dying and time is critical, you do without the conveniences to which you’re accustomed. A dozen Boy Scouts with a few hand tools and lots of line could have given them a sturdy bridge in less than a day. At every campout, I stand in awe of what those boys can do. They know what it means to “Be Prepared.” Certain other people obviously don’t.
Another was the inability to evacuate people because the military lacked yet another convenience: Inclement weather had grounded their helicopters.
I’ve lived through more than 150 hurricanes and typhoons — several while I was at sea. Hurricane Hugo, a Category 5 storm that struck the US in 1989, was the most memorable. By comparison, Morakot was a wee breeze. At the height of the storm, a 19 foot [5.8m] storm surge necessitated the evacuation of (ironically) the evacuation center. The windows and doors of the center were underwater. Rescue workers braved churning water and 149mph [240kph] winds to cut a hole through the roof and get those people out. They didn’t just leave them to die for lack of a few lousy helicopters.
I also wonder about the officers farther south, whose men were eager to help but didn’t receive orders until three days after the storm hit. General Douglas MacArthur once said: “It’s the orders you disobey that make you famous.” If their leaders had gotten into trouble for acting on their own initiative, and did what their superiors should have ordered them to do in the first place, I believe that public opinion would have resulted in their getting medals for it.
Is that the kind of leadership that’s supposed to protect us from the Chicoms? Lord help us. It would be too much to hope that the Chicom leadership is worse.
JERRY MILLS
Shilin, Taipei City
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations