Taiwan’s Katrina moment
Like Hurricane Katrina, Typhoon Morakot brought flooding that local infrastructure could not withstand, while the aftermath was beyond the local capacity for disaster relief.
Tax revenue and power are largely in the hands of the central government, at the cost of effective administration of local affairs by local governments. The central government is responsible for managing major rivers and their upstream areas. It is therefore imperative that the central government take charge of disaster mitigation efforts, especially when dealing with a disaster of this scale.
In spite of this, what angered many people more than incompetent emergency management by the central government before, during and after Morakot was the leadership’s lack of understanding about the scale of the disaster and their appalling inaction in contrast to what is in their power to do.
The central leadership has come across as uninformed of the situation and unconcerned.
A week after Morakot hit Taiwan, an unknown number of people scattered in towns and villages across the south and east are still waiting for helicopters to rescue them.
There are potentially thousands still waiting for rescue, yet the Ministry of Foreign Affairs declined disaster relief offers from the US, Japan and other countries, claiming that Taiwan had the capacity to deal with the disaster itself.
The irony is that the government doesn’t even know how many people are missing, how many are waiting for helicopters or where they are, and that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) admitted on Wednesday that a lack of helicopters was hampering rescue efforts.
Just how efficient has the disaster response been? One soldier went public with his frustration, saying his unit was the only one in the south with heavy equipment needed for relief efforts after a disaster of this nature, yet four days after Morakot struck, his unit had yet to set to work. The soldiers wanted desperately to help the victims of this disaster, but were still awaiting orders.
In response, the Ministry of National Defense said procedures must be followed, adding that it was waiting for dispatch requests from the central government’s emergency management authority.
The chain of command doesn’t seem to be working very well.
On the evening of Morakot’s approach, Ma spent an hour and a half at a wedding banquet in Taipei. While he was busy mingling, did he know or care that disastrous torrential rains had begun pummeling the south? His administration was ill-prepared.
This “don’t-know-don’t-care” mentality is not new. When Ma was mayor of Taipei, his administration was infamous for its handling of a typical typhoon that led to unprecedented flooding in Taipei.
Unfortunately, Morakot has shown that his poor understanding of disaster relief and poor emergency management skills have carried over to the central government.
But this time, the scale of the disaster is much larger.
The Ma administration’s actions in the wake of Morakot reflect indifference toward protecting its own people from natural disasters.
Regardless of whether the Ma administration learns its lesson, it has certainly been an eye-opener for the public.
S. CHUAN CHIU
Bloomington, Indiana
Blaming the CWB is idiotic
As an expat who has lived in central Taiwan for six years, I am aghast at comments President Ma Ying-jeou made after the devastation of Typhoon Morakot. While I have no political leanings toward either of the two main parties, I find it absurd that the president would blame the Central Weather Bureau for not being more precise in its weather projections (“CWB defends itself against Ma jibe,” Aug. 11, page 3).
Clearly, the effects of the weather are not guided or altered by any meteorological agency or their computers and computer programs.
The aftermath of Typhoon Morakot is dreadful and passing the buck is neither necessary nor productive during the clean-up phase of this disaster.
It seems likely that meteorologists are doing their best. Finding fault with what the weather bureau did or didn’t do detracts from the focus on rebuilding lives and repairing the damage wrought by Morakot.
GARY L. VORE JR.
Nantou
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China