Who needs foreign help?
On Tuesday, Ministry of Foreign Affairs deputy spokesman James Chang (章計平) said that “Taiwan would not request foreign assistance at present because there were sufficient resources and the disaster relief mechanism was working well.” (“Aid workers race against time,” Aug. 12, page 3). Was this true?
According to a news report by cable channel SET-TV on Tuesday evening, more than 400 victims were rescued that day, but there were still at least 57 people missing and about 700 more trapped in disaster areas. Transferring these 700 people to a safer area would take more than one day.
Keep in mind that Typhoon Morakot had hit the country four days earlier, on Aug. 7. The anxious and frustrated families of these victims have fought over being a rescue priority. The crash of an exhausted rescue helicopter mission further broke the hearts of many Taiwanese. On what basis then did the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou state that “there were sufficient resources and the disaster relief mechanism was working well?”
If Taiwan had accepted international assistance, these 700 trapped victims could get to safer ground faster; the crew members of the chopper that went down might have had time for a proper meal; and the families of the victims might be able to rest instead of fighting over assistance.
Time is running out. By not accepting the offer of international assistance, many more people are suffering and might not be able to survive.
I do not know why the Ma administration made this decision, but I do know that the victims and their family members will always wonder if things could have been better if there had been international assistance.
Once Taiwan recovers from this devastating disaster, whoever took this decision not to ask for or accept international assistance should be subject to investigation. Taiwanese will not forgive mistakes made by this inefficient, apathetic, cynical and arrogant government.
MENG-MEI CHEN
Lausanne, Switzerland
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry