So anxious was Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili for support from the fledgling administration of US President Barack Obama that even though he had not been invited to make a speech, he raced to the annual Munich security conference in February to try to meet the key guest, US Vice President Joe Biden. Witnesses reported that Obama’s deputy initially sought to avoid a handshake or even eye contact, but the Georgian’s bullying won through, obliging Biden to arrange a chat the following day.
Saakashvili followed up this forced encounter by telling journalists: “It is obvious that during all types of negotiations between the United States and Russia, Georgia will be high on the agenda.”
Not so. Obama’s trip to Moscow last month made it clear that last August’s war between Georgia and Russia neither revived the Cold War, nor did it impact on the trend toward greater US-Russian cooperation that Obama promised during his election campaign. Georgia is a sideshow.
The reason is clear. A year on from the five-day war, most European governments as well as the Obama administration agree Saakashvili bears most of the blame.
As Nino Burjanadze, once a close Saakashvili ally, put it: “Saakashvili, deeply unpopular at home, launched a desperate and doomed military adventure in South Ossetia, so providing the Russians with an excuse to reoccupy bases they lost only three years ago.”
Biden’s latest encounter with the Georgian president in Tbilisi last month, reconfirmed the shift of tone from the Bush era. Although Biden made the usual noises about recognizing Georgia’s territorial integrity and rejecting any Russian sphere of influence, no formal agreements were made.
The trip was only arranged to show that Georgia had not been totally forgotten. Unless there were secret agreements as yet unreported, Biden disappointed Saakashvili by giving no clear promise to re-arm Georgia’s battered forces. He told the Georgian parliament the US would modernize the country’s military “with the focus on training, planning and organization.”
Uncoded, that could mean greater US oversight over the army and tighter control over any repetition of last August’s folly.
Biden’s officials also used the visit to deny Saakashvili’s hints that US monitors would soon join the EU team that patrols the Georgian side of the border with the breakaway region of South Ossetia. The EU has confirmed no such plans exist and that the issue will not be discussed until the autumn, if at all. That is welcome news. While Russian officials oppose any US role as “extremely harmful,” that is not the best reason for the EU to reject it. The EU must be able to operate independently of the US and the Georgian mission is a good place to show it can, especially as it was European rather than US mediation that achieved a ceasefire last August.
Biden’s call for democratic reforms and his meeting with opposition politicians in Tbilisi also struck a different note from the Bush era. While Bush pressed for Georgia to enter NATO and turned a blind eye to Saakashvili’s attacks on civil liberties, the new US administration wants an end to repression, while turning a blind eye to Georgia’s NATO aspirations.
The stalemate between Saakashvili and his local opponents continues, and the situation on the ground remains deadlocked. The villages where Georgians once lived inside South Ossetia have been ethnically cleansed and razed. The exodus of Georgians from Akhalgori, the last mixed area, carries on remorselessly. Diplomatically, the Russians have got their way by achieving the withdrawal of the observer mission from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, which used to work in and around South Ossetia, as well as the UN mission that covered Abkhazia, Georgia’s other breakaway region.
In theory, this could raise the risk of border clashes, but for the moment that is out of the question. This post-Soviet conflict is back to being “frozen.” Russia has won all it wanted (short of Saakashvili’s resignation) and has no interest in provoking new clashes. Saakashvili’s forces are too weak to take action.
Can nothing be done to improve matters?
Tom de Waal, a respected analyst of the Caucasus, argues that the West should open links to Abkhazia without recognizing its independence by taking “status-neutral” measures, such as supporting a direct shipping route between Abkhazia and Turkey, and getting Georgia to support it. This would not help Georgia recover Abkhazia, but it would lessen Abkhaz ties to Russia.
Steps of this kind would be useful, but they leave the big picture unchanged. Tens of thousands have lost their homes and hundreds their lives in a war for which Saakashvili — in spite of some slaps on the wrist from Obama and Biden — still has not had to pay a serious price.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry