One of the most discussed topics in judicial circles recently has been the 10th anniversary of the National Judicial Reform Conference. Not only did Judicial Yuan President Lai In-jaw (賴英照) give a speech about it at a public occasion, the Ministry of Justice organized a seminar to hear different opinions. In addition, Academia Sinica held a two-day conference on the subject and even President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) jumped on the bandwagon and met judges, prosecutors, lawyers and civil organizations early this month to hear their suggestions for judicial reform.
On the whole, neither the government nor non-governmental organizations are satisfied with judicial reform over the past 10 years. There has been limited improvement and the process has been criticized for being too slow. No wonder prosecutor Eric Chen (陳瑞仁) once said with a sigh that “good people are already worn out.”
From the much-anticipated judge law and the lack of progress with amendments to the Organic Act of Court Organization (法院組織法) — which deals with long-term development of the judicial system — to abuse of power by prosecutors, there is almost no reason to feel optimistic over the prospects of judicial reform.
But even if judicial reform has largely failed to meet expectations, it must be said that the establishment of a legal aid system was a significant achievement. It brought a ray of hope to disadvantaged groups, who can now receive legal aid from lawyers through the government’s assistance, without paying a penny.
The need for such legal aid was agreed upon at the National Judicial Reform Conference in 1999. It passed legislative review without being blocked and passed its third reading in 2003. On July 1 the following year, the Legal Aid Foundation was established.
In only five years, the foundation has helped tens of thousands of poverty-stricken people and provided professional legal assistance to many disadvantaged groups in handling individual cases.
Recently, the Judicial Yuan has been planning an amendment to the Legal Aid Act (法律扶助法) to submit to the legislature. Any new system should be reviewed after five years so that improvements and adjustments can be made. Yet it is baffling that the amendment would require the number of board directors and supervisors assigned by the government to account for more than 50 percent of board members, thus changing the original structure of the board of directors, which consists of more non-governmental directors and supervisors than government officials.
The main reason for this is that the legislature, while reviewing the central government budget at the beginning of this year, passed an attached resolution proposed by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus. The gist of the resolution is to prevent foundations that recieve more than 50 percent of their funding from the government from turning public funds into private funds, and to prevent them from escaping governmental and legislative oversight. To this end, it requires that more than 50 percent of the board members of such organizations be appointed government officials.
This resolution aimed at legally regulating government-funded incorporated foundations with substantial assets. This is entirely different from the Legal Aid Foundation, which depends on fixed government subsidies. Moreover, the foundation receives donations from the Judicial Yuan each year, and is therefore subject to legislative supervision. Even though the DPP caucus said at the time that the resolution should not apply to the foundation and has sent a letter to the Judicial Yuan to explain this, the Judicial Yuan seems bent on amending the Legal Aid Act.
The reason the Legal Aid Foundation has made such significant achievements is largely because its board of directors is made up mostly of non-governmental representatives and because the organization has been able to distance itself from government bureaucracy. Examples of countries with mature legal aid systems, including Britain, the US and Australia, show that services offered by government-owned yet civilian-run organizations can be very effective.
Even as judicial reform is battered by criticism from all sides, it is important to highlight the foundation as a rare achievement. To maintain this progress, the foundation should continue to be non-governmental.
Lin Feng-jeng is a lawyer and executive director of the Judicial Reform Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.