Notes from Bilingual School
Nowadays there are two types of government schools in Taiwan: Chinese and bilingual. A government Chinese school offers basic classes (math, science and history) in a Chinese-language setting.
A government bilingual school — a school that allows students with expat parents to study in English and Chinese — offers the same classes as the Chinese-language schools but are taught in an English-language setting.
Having a father who works at the Hsinchu Science Park has allowed me to attend the Hsinchu Science Park Bilingual School. I want to share some of my experiences and observations after four years there.
In Grade 4, my second year at the Bilingual School, my friends and I would see lots of kids from the Chinese Department — students not taking English studies — walking around the running tracks. We were really curious about them because we didn’t know them.
One day, when our class was playing soccer during Physical Education class, we heard someone shouting. We stopped playing and tried to find out the source of the noise. It was the “Chinese kids.” When we listened closer, we found out that they were complaining about how bad we were playing. Some boys in our class insulted them back in English.
The kids in the Chinese Department were confused by this and started asking each other what we meant.
This incident made me think about how lucky I am to speak Chinese and English.
During Grade 6, I started to sometimes wonder why some students were in the Bilingual School at all.
An example of this was one of my classmates. He was pretty good in most subjects, such as Chinese, math and science, but when it came to English class, he usually said: “It’s so boring.”
He would complain during English class because he wasn’t good at English.
Actually, he was not the only one in my class who did this. A few others are also good at Chinese but bad at English. Do these students really want to be in a bilingual setting?
The Bilingual School’s emphasis is allowing students to learn and understand more about the English language. Some students don’t want to be in the Bilingual Department since they don’t understand or enjoy the language; these students belong in a Chinese-language setting.
Throughout Grade 3 to Grade 6, I was very surprised at the extent to which my classmates enjoyed the “latest trends” that come from the West.
One example of this was the number of girls in my class who read the popular American novel Twilight. The boys — including me — in my class also enjoyed new American music artists and video games. Most of the boys in the class were crazy about a video game series called Halo (again, from the West). It was always on our “must-play list.”
The point I am making is that even though they are living in Taiwan, students at my school have developed these Western trends. Maybe it’s because of the Internet, classmates who “study” these trends or quite possibly just from learning in a foreign, English-language school environment. Overall, these trends are great for entertainment but bad for concentrating on studies and tests.
Do I enjoy being at the school? Yes. The Bilingual School environment provides friends, entertainment and English courses that you cannot find in other schools. It might be a little hard to get used to this environment if it is your first year in Taiwan, and the compulsory Chinese courses can be difficult. Still, I’m glad that the Bilingual School provides other courses of interest such as computers, art and music.
The best part is that you can learn to understand both Chinese and English — not something you can find everywhere.
SAMUEL HSIA
Jhubei, Hsinchu County
Remarkable resemblance
Your front-page story “No surprises as Ma elected next KMT chairman” (July 27) reads: “Ma [Ying-jeou, 馬英九], the sole candidate, received 285,354 of 303,987 votes, or 93.87 percent,” while the page 5 story “Macau chooses new chief executive” reads: “[Fernando] Chui’s [崔世安] election was a formality because he was the only candidate. He won the support of 282, or 94 percent, of [the city’s] chief executive electoral committee, formed mostly by people with ties to Beijing.”
Remarkably similar.
EDMUND RYDEN
Sinjhuang, Taipei County
Games fame
Michael Fagan (Letters, July 27, page 8) was partly right in saying that Taiwan would make the World Games world-famous. Those who could not distinguish between the World Games and the Olympics or the Paralympics now understand the differences between them.
But Fagan should accept the fact that the World Games raised Taiwan’s international profile. Taiwan is a well-known name, but often replaced by confusing titles like “Chinese Taipei” and “Republic of China” by politicians who consider “Taiwan” to be taboo.
Even in Kaohsiung, the Taiwanese team was called “Chinese Taipei.” Fortunately, the Games were held in Taiwan; had they been held in Kaohsiung, Chinese Taipei, some athletes might have gone to Taipei or even China.
Fagan is correct in calling Taiwan a “country.” But some, including President Ma Ying-jeou, see Taiwan as a region of “one China” as if it were a special administrative region or a province. Many license plates carry the name “Taiwan Province” even though the provincial government was abolished more than a decade ago.
Taiwan is a democratic country, but its government still worships deceased tyrants. Some people like to call Taiwan “the orphan of Asia” because it does not enjoy recognition by major countries nor enjoy participation in the UN or other international organizations. Taiwan’s international profile is vital to its identity.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs