Integrating metro lines
With the new Kaohsiung Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) up and running, local transport authorities should consider integrating the metro systems of the nation’s two main cities by using a smart card.
Kaohsiung, which has experienced rapid growth over the past 20 years, should be proud of its shiny new MRT, complete with the latest in public safety and technological standards.
When I was in Seoul this summer, I was impressed with the city’s “T Money” system — with the “T” standing for “travel, touch, traffic and technology.” This smart card system debuted in 2004, inspired, perhaps, by an earlier Japanese innovation in 2001, the Suica.
The idea of a metro card is nothing new, but what Suica — the “Apple” of smart cards — pioneered was a public transit card with a much broader use: a rechargeable train and bus card for use in multiple Japanese cities. Apple Inc has shown that what we never knew we needed is just what we can’t live without: the iPod, or more recently, the iPhone. Seoul’s T-Money card works in the same convenient way, allowing one to pay taxi fare or even buy a newspaper at a roadside stand with an easy-to-use “electronic money” card.
Taiwan should jump on this bandwagon and stands to benefit because of its small size. With the recent completion of the nation’s High Speed Rail, one of the most affordable, reliable high-speed trains I’ve even taken, the time has come to integrate local public transit systems.
I understand that the government may not be ready to spend money to change existing ticketing machines. But the city should consider the fact that it would benefit many local residents traveling between Taipei and Kaohsiung. A smart card would greatly benefit tourists, who would be able to buy a card upon arrival at Taoyuan or Kaohsiung airports and use it to travel around both cities with ease. Foreign visitors unable to read Chinese would find it exceptionally helpful.
When I lived in Seoul seven years ago, there was no integrated bus-to-train card, and we did the best we could, but few foreigners ever took buses. However, these days in Seoul I see more foreigners taking advantage of the public transit system. Imagine a similarly integrated Taiwan, welcoming foreign tourists with an all-in-one card that would get you around Taipei and Kaohsiung without having to calculate fares, wait in long lines at metro ticketing machines or haggle with taxi drivers. Just one click and you’d be off.
Taiwan is a country that benefits from its size: It is not so big as to be intimidating, but not so small that you can see everything in a day or two. The high speed rail has helped link the north and south metro areas. The government should take the next step in integrating its local metro systems as well.
JACOB HENDERSON
Seoul
Smarter way to trade
For the past five months, the issue of Taiwan and China signing an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) has been one of the hottest topics in local media. Supporters say signing an ECFA with China will prevent Taiwan from being marginalized when ASEAN+1 (China) takes effect next year. They also say this is what “flexible diplomacy” means. Opponents argue that signing an ECFA will favor only big companies and gradually diminish Taiwanese sovereignty through an economic merger with China.
In fact, “flexible diplomacy” means seizing the opportunity while you can to make developing countries adapt to your system and purchase your products in the long term. This can be seen in Taiwan’s dependence on imports of Japanese and US merchandise. So why shouldn’t we take the chance to cooperate with China?
The answer becomes obvious when we see the many fake iPhones manufactured in China. Investors and entrepreneurs are concerned that technology is copied so fast in China. This is the main reason why we should avoid putting capital and technology in China and seek a smarter way to create long-term earnings.
If we want to change our attitude toward interacting with developing countries, we must no longer continue to rely on “cash diplomacy” but must find ways to benefit from business contracts. That’s a “win-win situation,” a way to create sustainable income while keeping good diplomatic ties with other countries. This is the lesson we should take away from the ECFA issue.
LIU SHIH-LING
Taipei
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and