History is replete with examples of politicians using self-deprecating humor to deflect embarrassing moments or soften perceptions of arrogance.
The Presidential Office’s recent attempt at humor, however, provided neither. On the contrary, the bad timing and casual manner in which the Presidential Office responded to President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) blunder in his online video displayed not wit, but something bordering on contempt.
A few hours after Ma started his weekly online video on Saturday, a savvy Internet user found that the president had pre-recorded videos for the next two Saturdays, which put the extemporaneous value of the whole endeavor into question. Reacting to the discovery, the Presidential Office praised the Internet user, calling her skills “impressive” and offering her “a mystery prize” — a detective book authored by Miyabe Miyuki titled Who.
“If the Internet user does not want to keep the book, she can sell it online and could even get a good price for it,” Presidential Office Spokesman Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) said, demonstrating that the book had been signed by Ma, with comments encouraging the Internet user to “seek the truth.”
In one flourish of Ma’s pen (if it was his), the Presidential Office hoped the time warp could instead give the impression that the incident was nothing more than an opportunity for the Presidential Office to offer mystery prizes.
Neither the Presidential Office nor Ma has made any sense of the issue, but the affair does highlight a disingenous tendency in the president.
The Presidential Office said Ma’s weekly online video — Weekly Journal on Governing the Country — was inspired by US president Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Fireside Chats. It later acknowledged that the idea was borrowed from US President Barack Obama’s online weekly address.
The initiative was meant to serve as a platform allowing the president to have two-way communication with netizens on events that occurred during the week (a comment box in which users could express their opinions was only added days after the page was launched).
As suggested by its title, the video was meant to address weekly topics. It is impressive that the president considers himself able to predict the issues of the week.
If this is the best the NT$1.6 million (US$49,000) budgeted for this project can get us, then how easy it is to imagine the projects — helping low-income families pay for their children’s meals, for example — where that money could have been put to better use.
Wang said the president would remake the videos. Given how low Ma’s popularity has sunk, it would not be a bad idea for him to display the day’s newspaper in his weekly video to prove that it was recorded on the day in question.
In the “futuristic” July 25 edition of the Weekly Journal on Governing the Country, Ma gave advice to students filling in college applications and summed up by sharing his guiding principle, which is: “Engage people with sincerity and work with devotion and diligence.”
We await the president’s personal application of his advice with bated breath.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations