There is a Taiwanese saying that goes: “Man has two legs, money has four.”
As Taiwan’s economic bubble formed, this adage was often used to describe a situation in which it was easier to get rich by investing than through genuine hard work.
Indeed. In the past, Taiwan’s export-led economy benefited from Taiwanese industriousness and a fondness for saving money.
A plentiful supply of capital allowed Taiwan to gradually change from labor-intensive to capital-intensive industries. When capital-intensive industries became the dominant motivating force in the economy, shareholders — as providers of capital in a market economy — received a greater portion of the fruits of economic development than employees.
In reality, however, not everyone can become a shareholder.
According to figures compiled by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Taiwan’s nominal economic growth for the period 1998 to 2007 was 36.77 percent, but the average disposable income for each family only grew by 5.49 percent over the same period. It is clear, therefore, that most families did not get much of a share of the nation’s economic growth.
There was a period in which Taiwan’s information and electronics industries enjoyed strong growth and were hungry for talent. Companies in these sectors attracted technical personnel through profit-sharing arrangements that turned employees into shareholders. This created a layer of families comprising the scientific and technical elite — with no entrepreneurial background.
Unfortunately, the development of capital-intensive industries was limited by a lack of core knowledge and technical content. The information, electronic, petrochemical and other industries of which we were once so proud today face immense challenges as the international economic downturn squeezes profit margins.
Even white-collar technological employees who previously used specialist knowledge to get a share of the profits now face forced leave without pay and even unemployment. It seems that the only ones left in the winning circle are entrepreneurs with cross-sector mobility or political influence.
If government policy continues to give disproportionate protection to the interests of entrepreneurs, and if corporate responsibility to society does not become a widely accepted value, then the gap between rich and poor will continue to grow.
A one-sided policy of promoting economic growth by encouraging the development of capital-intensive industry instead of nurturing knowledge and technology-intensive manpower is one of the reasons for the growing rich-poor divide we see today.
Now, with the economy in recession, the cumbersome and inefficient nature of capital-intensive industries makes it hard to push through tax reform. The only thing that can be done is to call on the government to understand the importance of a knowledge-based economy.
The government should invest in creating a market environment and an education system that favor innovation, allowing people to realize their potential through innovation and creativity, to enjoy a share of the benefits of economic growth and to live and work in prosperity and dignity through the fruits of their labor.
This would be the best kind of education for families and for society in general, as opposed to government propaganda on “morals” and “good taste” that tells people how to live their lives.
Tristan Liu is a consultant for Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs