The recent rise in Taiwan’s stock markets has been described as a “groundless rebound,” but the public does not seem to see it that way. It seems small-time investors are investing in the market in a big way.
The government has for the most part remained optimistic about local stocks, with some leaders saying they believed the market rebound was a first sign of economic recovery. This illustrates that it is difficult to resist the benefits offered by a bubble economy. Not only does the public have a hard time seeing past the profits, those in power also have a hard time seeing past the potential boost to their reputation and voter support.
This “groundless rebound,” in which there is a clear gap between asset prices and the operational profits of businesses, is a basic indication of a bubble economy. In economics, a bubble economy is neutral in nature. Lopsided information causes the public to develop overly optimistic expectations about future market demand and prices during the upturn of an economic cycle.
The formation of a bubble economy — and its eventual rupture — are therefore part and parcel of normal market operations. But when overly optimistic expectations are the result of government policies or statements, political leaders are guilty of interfering in the market and misleading the public.
There are many possible reasons behind the surge in the stock market, including an inflow of hot money as a result of looser monetary policies around the world and a return of funds as a result of tax reforms and relaxed barriers to entering the Taiwanese market.
However, regardless of what is behind the rise in the stock market, leaders should at least qualify their statements and avoid rash remarks on the factors behind the upswing. Nor should they link increases in the stock market to their policies to try to prove they are correct and effective.
Although comments made by those in power do not always truthfully reflect a situation, they do normally reflect expectations or opinions about how a situation will develop. Such statements are often easily blown out of proportion by the media. This in turn affects decisions made by the public.
Studies have shown that assessments by the media or analysts that differ substantially from the real performance of an economy can cause larger fluctuations in financial markets including stock markets and exchange markets. In other words, both the formation of an economic bubble and the rupture of a bubble can be aggravated by the media’s role in promoting overly optimistic — or overly pessimistic — opinions.
The government, which is very apt at using the media to promote its policies, should avoid inappropriate remarks that could lead to overoptimism concerning the economy. Carelessness could cause a new wave of damage from an economic bubble.
Tristan Liu is a consultant for Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry