Transfer of sovereignty
I am glad that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) finally, on behalf of all Chinese, admitted implicitly that the 1943 Cairo Declaration had no legal binding effect on the status of Taiwan and Penghu (“Treaty confirmed sovereignty: Ma,” April 29, page 3.) He now has to resort to twisting and bending the words in the 1951 San Francisco Treaty and the 1952 Treaty of Taipei (or the Peace Treaty between Japan and the Republic of China (ROC) government-in-exile) to justify his denial of Taiwanese’s right to their own land.
Everyone, including the Chinese, now agrees that the Cairo Declaration is meaningless and that the only legal document that can affect the international legal status of Taiwan and Penghu is the San Francisco Treaty.
I’d like to note that those whose fate is decided by the land they live in are slaves, and that those who get to decide the fate of the land they live in are free men.
The question regarding the status of Taiwan and Penghu ultimately rests with whether Taiwanese are slaves of the land they live in or whether they are free men who own the land.
We will see how real are the claims by self-proclaimed liberal and enlightened societies that say they are committed to liberty, progress and humanity.
My question is: Does the “progressive” administration of US President Barack Obama see Taiwanese as slaves of the land, who should be transferred between parties? (“US may launch Taiwan Policy Review,” April 24, page 1.)
SING YOUNG
Taoyuan
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) reportedly claims that the 1952 Treaty of Taipei asserted “de jure transfer of Taiwan’s sovereignty to the ROC.” But that is not true.
Article 2 of the Treaty of Taipei states: “It is recognized that under Article 2 of the Treaty of Peace which Japan signed at the city of San Francisco on 8 September 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the San Francisco Treaty), Japan has renounced all right, title and claim to Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores) as well as the Spratley Islands and the Paracel Islands.”
The article means that as of Sept. 8, 1951, Taiwan’s sovereignty was not Japan’s to transfer.
Therefore, the Treaty of Taipei, which was signed on April 28, 1952, could not, did not, cannot and does not transfer Taiwan’s sovereignty.
ROBERT PENNINGTON
Ilan County
Stuck with ‘Chinese Taipei’
The pace of using “Chinese Taipei” for Taiwan has accelerated since Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) became president.
First, Ma expressed his appreciation for Chinese permission to allow Taiwan to participate in the Beijing Olympics as “Chinese Taipei.”
Recently, somebody moved Yushan (玉山) from Taiwan to “Chinese Taipei” in the competition for the world’s seven new wonders.
Now the WHO has invited “Chinese Taipei” to the World Heath Assembly (WHA) as an observer — subject to an annual renewal.
Ma has stated that the name “Chinese Taipei” does not belittle Taiwan or damage national dignity. Is this statement true or false?
Taiwan is an island nation — not a city nation. What if city states like Singapore or the Vatican were called “Malaysian Singapore” or “Italian Vatican”? The use of “Taipei” for Taiwan marginalizes the rest of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu. This is unacceptable at home.
The adjective “Chinese” indicates that Taipei is under China’s control. If “Chinese Taipei” wants to join the WHA, the WHO, the UN or any other world organizations, it will have to be first approved by China. The rest of the world cannot say anything. A name like “Chinese Taipei” makes Taiwan even worse than Hong Kong and Macau. This is unacceptable internationally.
If this trend of using “Chinese Taipei” continues, the name “Taiwan” might disappear from the Earth. The Taiwan Relations Act with the US might become the “Chinese Taipei Relations Act.” Ma would cease to be the “president of the ROC.” And when he dies, he would simply be the “ashes of a Chinese Taipei resident” instead of the “ashes of a Taiwanese” as he claimed during the presidential election.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry