Governments are trying to find ways to weather the difficult times as the global economic downturn and rising unemployment make everyone insecure.
Overcome with worry, it seems we can only look on from the sidelines and wait for a gifted leader to save us. But can we really not see a light at the end of the tunnel when we are at the lowest point in our lives?
Politicians tend to spend money where it is needed most, which includes not only necessary construction projects, but also what helps them win votes.
Therefore, in the past several years, many freeways and interchanges have been built across the nation that were unnecessary as they did not actually help improve people’s living standards.
Living standards are often defined as accessibility to arts by the cultural sector, and performance and exhibition venues are often viewed as an index.
I wonder if this is correct. Would the government be able to kill two birds with one stone if the expenditure aimed at increasing employment were invested in culture?
We should take advantage of the recession to slow down and adjust our living standards. In times of high growth, everybody rushes to make money without thinking of improving standards of living.
When it comes to construction relating to living conditions, money always takes precedence. As a result, luxurious houses are everywhere and many households have an expensive car.
A humanistic urban environment and ecological landscapes are lacking. Compared with 30 years ago, we have become much wealthier and our horizons have expanded. However, excessive self-satisfaction and self-confidence has meant that we have not worked hard enough to enhance our aesthetic abilities.
The first touchstone of a country’s living standard is the urban street system, including sidewalks and curbs.
To this day, the streets in Taipei are badly repaired and bumpy. When it rains, pedestrians have nowhere to go as cars splash water everywhere. We are so used to poor living standards that we don’t know that puddles are not seen on streets in well-built cities.
The second touchstone of a country’s living standard is access to drinkable tap water. After World War II, the US was one of the few countries where water could be drunk directly from the tap.
In 1967, I stopped in Europe on my return to Taiwan from the US. In Europe, I found the lack of drinkable tap water inconvenient. But by the 1970s, tap water was drinkable in almost every developed country. Although Taiwan is now an advanced country, it has never been able to achieve this goal. Whatever the reason, the government lacks the ability to solve the problem.
Building spectacular theaters designed by foreigners could increase the visibility of Taiwan, but it does not increase public living standards. It is very difficult to imagine how a few buildings of a kind that are rare even in Europe and the US would improve the spiritual standard of living in such a disorganized environment. From a cultural perspective, all this fails to touch on the root of the problem.
If we could calm our minds and stop reaching for what is beyond our grasp and instead implement construction projects based on people’s daily lives, practical, advanced aesthetic standards would develop among the public. If we could take this opportunity and spend the next few years improving our mindset and become a spiritually advanced country, we could turn misfortune into a blessing. I hope those in power give this some real thought.
Han Pao-teh is director of the Museum of World Religions.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs