In the 1950s, the government started giving extra points to students of indigenous heritage to ensure they would have opportunities for education. The fairness and necessity of this policy has often been questioned.
As exams such as the General Scholastic Ability Test and the Basic Competence Test for Junior High School Students purportedly emphasize fairness, the system of extra points seems flawed.
Each year, people write articles criticizing the policy, which fuels ethnic tension.
Giving indigenous students extra points but no complimentary educational measures is like giving a stimulant to a sick patient: After first feeling invigorated, he or she slips back into the same state once the effect wears off.
Later in their schooling, indigenous students who have had lower results often experience a lack of confidence, high stress and difficulty adjusting to their school environment, sometimes leading them to drop out.
“Benefits” is a beautiful description for a system that is essentially a form of educational welfare. It is not education, however, the goal of which is to increase a student’s abilities. Regardless of how many extra points are doled out — be it the current 25 percent or even 100 percent — it will not improve the academic abilities of students.
Research by Kao Shu-fang (高淑芳) shows that the academic performance of indigenous students remains below that of other students in languages, math and sciences, even when an additional 20 percent to 127 percent of their original score is tacked on.
Would indigenous students do better if teachers had a better idea of cultural diversity and could teach according to a student’s capabilities and needs? What would the average performance of indigenous students be if they were given individual tutoring and counseling after entering a school with lower scores thanks to extra points?
Educational content must, after an assessment, be designed to fit the abilities of gifted students, such as in the Individualized Education Program. Yet in the case of indigenous students who lag behind, boosting their scores is seen as a adequate to solve all problems. This is preposterous.
The problem of lower scores among indigenous students has been around for decades, yet the Ministry of Education has not come up with any solutions.
There are two possible reasons for this. The first is that there are no indigenous senior officials at the ministry and so it does not understand the importance of this issue. Secondly, those in charge of indigenous education might not know what to do. Who is in charge of education of indigenous students at the ministry, how much is spent on indigenous education annually and what are the ministry’s policies?
The gaps in education levels between indigenous and Han students have widened over the decades. Dropout rates among indigenous students are eight times that of other students, surveys indicate, and the graduation rate is only one-sixth that of other university students.
The potential and skills of our children, regardless of their ethnicity, are a precious asset. Every child should receive education suited to their abilities and cultural diversity should be respected.
Educational authorities should release a white paper on this subject and consider proposing amendments to the law, establishing an indigenous education unit and organizing a conference on the subject.
It is high time there was a change in the situation.
Pan Yu-fong is an associate professor at the Department of Special Education at National Taiwan Normal University and secretary of the Taiwan Indigenous Professor Society.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON AND TED YANG
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry