Ann Daniels, 44, polar explorer, is about to trek 1,200km to the geographic North Pole. By the time she arrives, she will have dragged a 52kg sledge for 100 days and put up with great hardship: temperatures of minus 52ºC, plunging into Arctic waters, no luxuries, dehydrated food, a cup, spoon, pencil and a diary. She won’t even be able to wash or change her clothes for more than three months. But there is one thing she won’t sacrifice: phone calls to her children — triplets Lucy, Joseph and Rachel, 14, and five-year-old Sarah.
“The phone is really for operational purposes,” she said, “but if they [the team] want me to perform, I just have to use it for the family. Going on past experience, I’m fine for about three weeks, then I start to pine and am really unhappy, so I get on the phone. They never really want to know what I’m up to. They just want to tell me what they’ve been doing. Then I’ve had my fix and I’m OK again.”
Daniels has been to the North Pole six times, but the Catlin Arctic Survey is her first scientific expedition. Led by Pen Hadow, the polar explorer, its aim is to measure the rate at which the polar ice cap is melting.
“Ann’s as tough as you like,” said Hadow, who describes her as immensely grounded and cool under pressure. “She is the best woman explorer in the world.”
We meet at her village home in Devon where she lives with her partner, Tom O’Connor, an aircraft engineer who is on nights and asleep upstairs.
Sarah, her youngest, is milling around eating her mother’s expedition rations of chocolate chips — you can’t take bars of chocolate into the Arctic, Daniels said, as she pulls her daughter close, because the chocolate gets so frozen it would break your teeth.
Outside there is heavy snow, and Daniels’s parents, who “move in for every expedition and take over my life,” are dressed in heavy knits and scarves, but Daniels is wearing a light jumper because by her standards this cold is close to tropical. Inside, there’s a play-school atmosphere — bits of paper and glass beads on the kitchen table — mother/daughter art-project bonding before she leaves in five days.
“The children are a barometer for me,” she said. “I always think, I’ve got to come home. So I don’t take stupid risks.”
Not that everyone agrees. There are plenty who say mothers shouldn’t leave their children to do something so dangerous. She went on a TV chatshow in the late 1990s “knowing the whole show would slag me off. I was the mother from hell.”
But one woman stood up and said she admired her personal ambition. Still, she is disappointed by how little attitudes have shifted since Alison Hargreaves, the mother and climber, was killed on an expedition to K2 in 1995.
“That was more than 13 years ago and I’m still being hit with her name,” she cried. “How many other mothers have died in that time on motorways, and in work environments, whether they be policewomen or nurses or cleaners. Nobody ever mentions them. It’s always Alison Hargreaves doing her job.”
“She does have a harder time from society,” said Hadow, who has two children, “much harder than me.”
Daniels’s children, for their part, are sanguine.
“It just feels ordinary because she’s my mum,” said Joseph, when I ask him what it’s like having a mother with two frostbitten toes.
Plus, he rather likes the routine: “She doesn’t work every day. She stays home for, like, a couple of years and then goes away in one chunk.”
He says they will follow her progress by sticking pins in a map and he’s looking forward to his present: snow from the North Pole.
“Mum puts it in bottles and brings it back,” he said, “but the problem is, it melts.”
His only difficulty with her job is how to explain it:
“When people ask, I say she’s a walker. I don’t know how else to describe it,” he said.
Daniels is a firm leader through the frozen unknown and yet for years she never left her hometown of Bradford in northern England. Her father was a door-to-door insurance salesman, her mother was a secretary for a large company. Growing up, she was a tomboy with four older brothers.
“My poor father wanted a girl but then one pops up who is into climbing trees and running around and watching football and rugby,” she said.
She thrived at school and was the only one in her family to pass any exams — “but university was never an option in my family,” so she focused on “doing the right thing”.
She got married, aged 21, and worked as an office junior for NatWest bank, rising through the ranks to assistant branch manager. In 1994, she went on maternity leave — she had had fertility problems and opted for IVF — planning to return to middle management. But having triplets changed everything.
“Everyone said, ‘You won’t cope, here’s my number, ask for help, don’t feel a failure,’ and I thought, ‘I damn well will cope,’” she said.
She didn’t just discover enormous resolve through her children. They also up-ended all her ideas of a conventional life.
“I’d left the safe bank and what was expected of me, had three children rather than one and was having a great time. I thought, there’s a big world out there,” she said.
The breakthrough came in 1995, when her husband showed her a newspaper advertisement asking for volunteers for the McVitie’s Penguin Polar Team Relay to the North Pole. More than 300 women applied and they all gathered for SAS-type trials. Daniels ended the day in tears.
“I was so outclassed. They were all hardy outdoor types who had climbed Kilimanjaro in a weekend. But they told us to come back in nine months for four more days and that’s when they would pick the team,” she said.
So while her babies slept, she did push-ups in the garden, skipping, running, anything to increase her fitness. When they announced the team at the end of the trials she wept again, but this time with happiness.
“That was when I fell in love with the Arctic Ocean and expedition life,” she said. “It blew my mind. Before that, my sum total experience of nature was two weeks outdoor training.”
Life moved quickly on her return. She was part of the first all-women’s team to ski to the North and South poles between 1998 and 2002. She also tried to ski solo to the North Pole in 2005 but had to abandon the attempt due to permit problems. Her marriage broke down when the children were three. She met O’Connor in 2001, and had Sarah two years later, but providing for her children is a big drive. Consequently, she took on a day job as a motivational speaker, and uses such phrases as: “You have to put the pain in the box.”
Daniels’s job on the expedition is to cook, which sounds easy, but isn’t.
“In the morning, it’s minus 45ºC and you’ve got to get out your sleeping bag to light the cooker. You can’t speak because your brain slows down and you are just so cold. You tense every muscle,” she said.
Her routine is making tea and coffee, plus dehydrated porridge, then melting enough snow to fill flasks with the six liters of water they will need for the day. This takes three hours, which is why Daniels will get up at 3am. They plan to trek in 75-minute bursts, with five-minute breaks, when they eat chocolate chips, nuts and biscuits. The biggest challenge — apart from the polar bears, storms, frostbite and hypothermia — is eating enough.
“We have to get in 6,000 calories and we still lose weight,” she said. “By the time I come back I expect to be a goddess!”
Dinner is dehydrated chicken curry and rice or beef and potato stew.
The lack of terra firma, it becomes clear, is what makes the North Pole so testing.
“The ice moves, breaks up, and you can be in danger of being mangled, crushed up with the ice as it shifts,” she said.
The South Pole is much easier, she said, because it’s just an endless flat white wasteland.
So why does she do it? It’s not for solo self-advancement, that’s for sure.
“She’s not about strutting her stuff,” Hadow said.
My guess is that her reports of cracking ice, sensory deprivation and howling wind are partly about conquest and moral determination — “It’s the challenge and not only coming out of it, but being able to deal with it and deal with it well” — but also about something far more primitive.
“Yes, it’s cold, yes it’s terrible, yes it’s painful,” she said, “but actually it’s nature at its best and it’s huge and it makes you realize just how small you are — how humble, how insignificant.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.