Last Saturday, The government issued consumer vouchers to the public for the first time. Since then, officials have been doing all they can to promote the vouchers, while shops are offering a multitude of ways consumers might spend them.
All this hype has prompted a veritable spending craze among voucher recipients, which include all citizens and resident foreign spouses. For the disadvantaged, such as the unemployed and those with low incomes, the government’s “red envelope” of NT$3,600 just before the Lunar New Year may not lift them out of poverty, but it will be of some comfort.
With this in mind, we are reluctant to spoil the fun by throwing cold water on the scheme.
Still, we have to remind the self-contented government of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) that the vouchers are no more than a temporary stimulant. They may be able to spur the economy for a short while, but they are not going to save it.
The government should not be satisfied with short-term effects while ignoring long-term planning. If it does not take action at the opportune moment, the economy will sink deeper and deeper into trouble.
The voucher issue is a first for Taiwan. Japan is the only country to have tried a similar policy in the past, and the results there were not very satisfactory.
However, the government still copied the Japanese example, showing that its financial and economic team was unable to come up with much to face the once-in-a-century economic tsunami.
Besides the fact the measure can only bring the country temporary relief, it is important to note that the vouchers have been paid for by raising debt under a special budget.
In other words, the government has borrowed money from the future to handle the predicament it faces today. Fundamentally, this is not much different from having consumers take out bank loans themselves.
While taxpayers may feel that this NT$3,600 is a gift from heaven, they should not be too happy too soon. There is no such thing as a free lunch and we will eventually have to repay the voucher loan plus interest.
The government’s optimistic estimate says the NT$85.6 billion (US$2.55 billion) in vouchers could boost the annual economic growth rate by 0.64 percent. However, the real reason for poor domestic demand is not the public’s reluctance to consume but the fact that many newly unemployed people have no money for shopping at all.
Even those who do have money in their pockets dare not spend it now because they are worried that they, too, could lose their jobs.
On top of this, many workers’ buying power has been hit by salary cuts. As fear of unemployment spreads, people’s consumption behavior tightens. These vouchers are really no more than a year-end subsidy that may make up for the shortfall in consumption but cannot stimulate it further. The economic benefit may be less than the government expects.
Taiwan’s economic ills arise not only from poor domestic demand, but also from a serious decline in exports. Many companies are closing down or slashing output. They are laying off employees, cutting salaries or forcing workers to take unpaid leave. With higher unemployment figures and lower salaries, a knock-on effect cuts consumption.
The decline of consumption power is part of a vicious cycle caused by the loss of job opportunities and falling wages — structural problems that the vouchers cannot resolve. At the same time, exports to China and Hong Kong were down 54 percent year-on-year last month and figures show the drastic decline is already taking a heavy toll on the economy.
Taiwanese companies are very much tied in to the Chinese market.
Now that exports to China have fallen so far, it seems that the country’s China-oriented bent is doing more harm than good to the economy.
A couple of years ago Chinese academic Hu Angang (胡鞍鋼) likened Taiwan’s economy to a diabetes patient who could die in seven days without “insulin” from China. That may sound arrogant, but it reflects the reality that Taiwan’s economy has become irreversibly reliant on China.
We do not wish to gloat over the inadequacy of the voucher plan. Rather, we wish to highlight the fact that the country’s economic problems stem from its heavy reliance on China.
Since Ma took office, his government has made no attempt to fix this structural flaw. On the contrary, it has accelerated economic integration with China by loosening restrictions on investment there while calling anyone who questions this policy an isolationist.
Now, to cover his flawed pro-China policy, Ma has made an overdraft on taxpayer dollars to pay for the consumer voucher stunt.
Officials from Ma and Premier Liu Chao-hsiuan (劉兆玄) down have presented this “consumer shopping show” in the hopes it will, at least for the time being, make the public forget about the country’s economic woes.
What worries us is that Ma’s government is only concerning itself with short-term benefits, rather than the overall situation.
Ma is unwilling to recognize that his pro-China policy lies at the root of the problem and is prescribing the wrong treatment for Taiwan’s economic illness. It is indeed the country’s misfortune to have such people in charge.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations