On Jan. 5, the computer system used by the National Immigration Agency (NIA) to store large amounts of information and to check travel documents crashed for a total of 36 hours.
As a result, all of Taiwan’s airports were unable to access crucial online information, which not only caused problems for travelers wanting to enter or exit Taiwan, but also severely damaged the nation’s reputation in terms of national security and the international image of Taiwanese airports.
While a large computer crash like this may seem to be a technical problem, a look at the crisis management during the 36 hours the system was down reveals problems with the national security system.
What is the source of this systemic problem?
We can examine these problems by looking at the way the situation was handled before and after it occurred.
Media reports said the NIA had reported the computer problems to higher authorities prior to the incident but had received no response.
This shows that there were communication problems between the NIA and higher authorities, which implies that these superiors were insensitive to the link between information security and national security.
While the NIA appears to fall under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of the Interior, border control and immigration affairs involve the work of the National Security Bureau, the Mainland Affairs Council, the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of the Interior.
All of these organizations rank higher than the NIA, and there are many blind spots when it comes to communication between the NIA and these organizations.
To be more precise, many of the NIA’s problems may occur because of unclear organizational definitions and objectives. It is not clear whether the NIA should focus on immigration matters or inspection and control matters.
However, the NIA’s superiors are apparently hoping the agency will focus more on immigration matters. This may have resulted in less attention being given to the affairs of inspection and control departments, and it is this lack of attention that may have resulted in the recent gap in our national security.
The NIA was established two years ago because it was decided that an organization with unified regulatory authority was needed to handle immigration matters in a better way. The problem with this was that the authorities rushed their approval of the establishment of the NIA.
This meant that the NIA did not receive adequate time to transform itself and train its staff, which caused the organization to be plagued by inadequacies even before it was established, and full of imbalances after it was up and running.
To my understanding, when the NIA was initially established there were many interorganizational integration and adjustment problems. These included problems within the NIA itself as well as between the NIA and other organizations. The internal integration problems came from having to integrate civil servants and police personnel with the police personnel coming from the Aviation Police Office, the foreign affairs police and civil servants coming from the Ministry of the Interior.
Problems with integration were bound to occur when people from different systems and cultures came together to work, especially if they were not given long-term training and adequate time to get accustomed to one another.
I said two years ago that one of the challenges facing the new NIA was the lack of a sound inspection system. This is a worrying situation, because without an internal control mechanism the NIA could face problems such as slacker work standards and a deterioration in discipline among its staff.
Currently, although the NIA has a position called “inspector,” the functions of this position are very different to the inspection system present in the police force. In addition, the establishment of such an inspection system is closely linked to the NIA’s organizational definitions and objectives.
In terms of the NIA’s links with other organizations, there are a great number of problems with the division of duties between it and the National Police Agency alone, not to mention with other organizations.
Many NIA officials were transferred from the police. Once they had their duties assigned to them, they discovered that the NIA did not have the power and rights of the judicial police. As a result, NIA employees are not entitled to conduct on-the-spot inspections or carry guns, which is problematic when battling human trafficking.
In terms of how the computer crash was handled after it occurred, media reports have said it took so long to fix because of human error during the repair process. There have even been reports that once a qualified technician was found, the problems were solved within two hours.
This makes one wonder whether the NIA’s trained professionals are qualified for their jobs or whether other factors stop people with specialized skills from being given appropriate positions.
In the face of a computer system breakdown that can jeopardize national security and Taiwan’s international image, such a situation also makes one wonder whether the NIA has ever conducted drills and data backups to help the agency cope in the event of an emergency.
It also makes one wonder whether the NIA has adequate staff on hand at airports and if not, whether there is any mechanism for cooperation between the NIA and the police or other organizations.
I have raised these doubts because I hope similar incidents will not occur again in the NIA. We cannot afford to ignore the gaps in national security caused by the NIA’s computer crash. It is also worthwhile to discuss and come up with ways to improve the overall definition of the NIA as an organization as well as its overall design and system.
Yang Yung-nane is a professor in the department of political science and associate dean of the College of Social Sciences at National Cheng Kung University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.