Early in his tour as commander of US forces in the Pacific and Asia, Admiral Dennis Blair was asked in a Congressional hearing what he sought to accomplish with military exchanges with China.
The admiral said he wanted the Chinese to understand two things:
First, they should be reassured: “We’re not sitting here planning to attack China. We’re not sitting here planning to contain China. We’re not sitting here dying to pick a fight with China.”
Second, he intended to warn the Chinese against miscalculation, the message being: “Don’t mess with us.”
Thus it is not hard to imagine the tall, lean, and plain-spoken retired admiral, who has been nominated by US president-elect Barack Obama to be the nation’s top intelligence officer, looking the president right in the eye during a crisis and delivering a candid report: “Mr President, here are the facts as best we know them.”
As Director of National Intelligence, Blair would be responsible for setting objectives and standards for 16 disparate agencies such as the Central Intelligence Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency, and for coordinating their sometimes conflicting operations.
Blair, who must be confirmed by the Senate, began his intelligence career as a young officer whose collateral duties included taking pictures of other nation’s ships in ports his destroyer visited or encountered at sea.
As a senior officer, he was an associate director of intelligence at the CIA, with a desk in the executive offices on the seventh floor at Langley, the agency’s headquarters across the Potomac from Washington.
Blair’s main link with intelligence, however, has been as a consumer. He absorbed intelligence on the staff of the National Security Council (NSC) in the White House, as director of the Joint Staff in the Pentagon and especially as commander of the Pacific Command.
From the headquarters in Honolulu, he ran the world’s largest command with 300,000 people operating from the west coast of the US to the east coast of Africa.
Blair’s experience includes extensive exposure to Asia, having travelled widely as Pacific commander, and some to Europe as a member of the NSC staff.
He majored in Russian studies as a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford University.
He has had less contact with issues in the Middle East, Africa and Latin America and will necessarily rely on others in those fields.
A recent essay Blair wrote for the National Bureau on Asian Research in Seattle provides clues to his thinking on military power in Asia.
“China, India and Japan will not match the power projection capability of the US,” he wrote.
Even so, they are “all developing the ability to deploy forces with the military capacity to threaten US power projection task groups.”
Blair asserted that “rather than initiating a scramble for power and influence in the region, the major nations in Asia seem more likely to use their power projection capabilities for symbolic purposes.”
He said, however, “a scramble for power and influence among major Asian powers would be likely if a drawdown of the US forward deployed military presence occurs in Asia.”
After he took charge of the Pacific Command’s headquarters in Honolulu in 1999, Blair showed that he was a demanding, if quiet, taskmaster.
Dissatisfied with the command’s war plans, he ordered them updated to account for China’s acquisition of modern Russian warplanes and ships.
“That was laborious stuff,” said one officer. “It took thousands of man-hours. Some of the staff had to work so hard they started calling it the ‘Blair Witch Project,’” the name of a popular horror movie.
Blair retired from the Navy in 2002.
In contrast, even though he is considered by some to be an intense, aloof workaholic, Blair has occasionally shown a playful streak. As captain of the destroyer Cochrane, with its home port in Japan, he tried to water ski behind the ship after she had been at sea for many weeks. Blair told friends he thought the crew needed a bit of entertainment.
Blair went over the side and was fed a rope by the crew of a gig, or small ship, then got into position aft of the ship to be pulled up on the water skis. When the destroyer started to speed, however, the sea was rough and Blair lost control. He went head over teakettle into the ocean, much to the glee of the sailors gathered on the fantail to see their skipper dunked.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with