Twice in the last three decades, Mexico has demonstrated that one country’s profligacy and mismanagement can spell economic catastrophe beyond its borders.
In 1982, the country defaulted on its foreign debt and set off a Latin American debt crisis that led to a decade of anemic growth across the region. In 1994, the peso collapsed and halted capital flows to emerging markets around the world, until the administration of former US president Bill Clinton arranged a US$50 billion Mexican bailout.
But this recession, it is the profligate US pulling down fiscally disciplined Mexico.
Like a host of middle-class countries, from South Africa to Brazil, Mexico is credited by economists with prudent economic policies that reduced debt and tamed inflation, but that has not saved any of them from the pain of a global recession. Billions of dollars have been pulled from emerging markets as investors seek the safest haven, which is still considered to be US Treasury bills.
When the US economy began to spiral downward, officials here argued that Mexico’s hard-won macroeconomic stability would protect it.
Nowadays, as each week brings more bad news from the US, those forecasts seem quaintly optimistic. The North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, which so tightly bound Mexico and the US and turns 15 today, is helping drag Mexico down with the US just as it helped bolster it when times were good north of the border.
When the US economy was growing, successive governments in Mexico counted on foreign investment and exports to generate growth. Exports account for almost a third of Mexico’s gross domestic product. But more than 80 percent of them go to the US, and when American consumers stop buying, there is no market for Mexican-made big-screen televisions, auto parts or expensive winter fruit.
“In the face of the most serious contraction in decades, it is hard to imagine that Mexico will avoid recession too,” said Gray Newman, Latin American economist for Morgan Stanley in New York.
The effect on Mexico is becoming clear. Unemployment is at its highest in eight years. The peso has fallen 25 percent, leading to a spike in the price of imports, hurting consumers and businesses that reply on imported goods. Exports, industrial production and retail sales have all fallen in the last few months.
Although the government has yet to change its growth forecast of 1.8 percent for next year, private analysts say Mexico’s economy will not grow at all this year. In the worst case, the economy could contract as much as 1.7 percent, according to BBVA Bancomer, Mexico’s largest bank.
BAD NEWS
Bad economic news dominates the media. Every morning for the last few weeks, the influential radio journalist Carlos Puig has invited business owners to call in and describe their troubles.
“The last thing we Mexicans lose is hope,” said one caller, Faustina Garcma, manager of a small building supplies company, Bester Mexicana, before beginning a passionate plea for government aid.
After a decade of sound economic management, Mexico’s government does have some room to maneuver. Next year, the government will run its first budget deficit in five years as it increases spending to give the economy a push. It is also taking on new loans from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank to support social and environmental projects. The central bank has almost US$85 billion in reserves to defend the peso and room to bring down interest rates.
On top of that, the finance ministry has dealt with the economy’s most glaring vulnerability — the dependence on oil export revenue to finance almost 40 percent of the country’s budget.
When Mexican crude was selling at US$130 a barrel last summer, officials began selling Mexico’s future exports for this year at US$70 a barrel, a price that seemed wildly conservative in those heady days. In the fall, the congress estimated a US$70 price for its budget projections this year. The government usually locks in the price of its future production by buying options to sell oil at a certain price. When the market price rises above the option price, the government loses money. When the price falls, as it has, the government makes a profit.
Buying the options cost the government US$1.5 billion last summer, but at the current price, below US$30, Mexico would stand to earn more than US$10 billion. That money would go to job creation plans in infrastructure, tourism and small business.
Mexico’s caution is a contrast to the policies of Latin America’s other main oil exporter, Venezuela. Under Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan economy has become more dependent on oil revenue to finance his social programs.
Analysts say that the Mexican government has taken the right steps but warn that more may be needed in the next couple of months.
“At the moment they have done what they can do to face the crisis,” said Jorge Mattar, the representative in Mexico for the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, or ECLAC. But the effect of the recession in the US is so large that the measures so far will only be a palliative, he said. In essence, there is only so much the government can do if exports plunge and factories close.
OTHER WORRIES
There are other worries. Even though the oil price Mexico will get is locked in at US$70, the amount of crude Mexico can pump is not. On Dec. 22, the state oil monopoly Pemex announced that production had fallen 9.3 percent for the year though November. Exports dropped 17.3 percent.
If the economy contracts, tax revenue will most likely fall. And even though Mexico’s finances are sound enough that it could borrow more to finance further spending increases, Newman of Morgan Stanley argues there will not be many buyers for emerging market debt.
The government will face particular pressure to continue to increase its social programs as the recession hits the poor hardest — and midterm elections approach in July.
Over the last few years, Mexico and Latin America have finally managed to achieve some success in reducing poverty. ECLAC estimates that the percentage of poor in the region has dropped to 33 percent, from 44 percent, since 2002. Extreme poverty has also fallen, to 13 percent, from about 19 percent.
In Mexico, a government program that provides payments to 5 million families to keep their children in school and take them to clinics regularly has been responsible for much of the improvement in extreme poverty.
Remittances from relatives working in the US have also helped reduce poverty in many regions, but those have dropped nearly 2 percent this year.
“There have been substantial gains by the main Latin American countries from the mid-1990s to 2006,” said Santiago Levy, a vice president at the Inter-American Development Bank in Washington, who started the Mexican program 11 years ago. “It would be very, very sad if this was lost.”
He recommends that governments shift their spending over to infrastructure projects that create jobs, like building much-needed rural roads. Governments should subsidize employers not to lay off workers and offer temporary scholarships to poor families so that they do not pull their children out of school, he said.
But Levy warns against any temptation to loosen the disciplined fiscal policies that Mexico and other developing countries have kept over the last years.
“Those gains were very hard to get,” he said. “We know how to preserve them. And we know how to avoid falling back.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under