Taking a more comprehensive view of the agreements signed at the second meeting between Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) of the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) of the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) in Taipei last month, the biggest danger is that the Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration has not conducted an assessment of the agreements’ impact on the nation’s security and economy.
Looking at the cross-strait air transportation agreement, the number of Taiwanese visitors to China reached 4.6 million last year, while a mere 320,000 Chinese visited Taiwan. The disproportionate number of Taiwanese visiting China and their consumption there is certain to have a negative impact on Taiwan’s consumer industry. Because faster air links will increase the speed with which such imbalances in the flow of travelers take place, the government must balance this development by increasing the flow of Chinese visitors to Taiwan.
When the SEF and the ARATS signed the first tourist agreement, the Ma administration drew a big tourism pie in the sky and increased the frequency of chartered flights to 108 weekly flights, thus increasing the one-sidedness of cross-strait exchanges. Further, the cross-strait air transportation agreement is supposed to lead to the arrangement of regular cross-strait traffic within six months, which will have an even greater impact on Taiwan’s consumer industry. Despite all this, the government still hasn’t conducted an assessment of the agreement’s impact.
Other things that will have the same kind of effect on Taiwanese industry are the deregulation policies, such as allowing 12-inch wafer plants to invest in China, relaxing limitations on China-bound investment, allowing financial institutions to open in China, recognizing Chinese academic credentials and accepting the Chinese gift of pandas despite heavy overtones of unification. Any of these deregulation policies may of course bring partial benefits, but they will also have a harmful effect, and will therefore have to be preceded by structural adjustments to minimize their negative impact on Taiwan. Despite this, the government hasn’t conducted any assessments, instead calling only for deregulation.
Under the air transportation agreement, Taiwan agreed to open several domestic airports to cross-strait flights. It has been repeatedly pointed out that doing so lowers the flights to domestic status and ignores Taiwan’s sovereignty, but the Ma administration has made no response. In particular, as China’s military deployments aimed at Taiwan have not been reduced, opening airports that are available for military and private use poses obvious risks to national security.
In addition, Penghu is Taiwan’s first line of defense, but has already opened to air and sea transportation to and from China. Taiwanese are still very clear on how Shi Lang (施琅), an early Qing dynasty official, used Penghu as a base for attacking Taiwan. Not only has the Ma administration not designed any measures to complement the opening of Penghu to allay public concerns, it has also come up with an unthinkable new principle for national defense based on the final battle taking place on Taiwanese soil, something that has dumbfounded the three military branches as well as national security experts.
Without any assessments, the Ma administration is making permanent blanket deregulations involving China policy in the hope that this will effectively cure all Taiwan’s ills while ignoring plummeting sovereignty, security, economic and human rights indexes.
Joseph Wu is a research fellow at the Institute of International Relations at National Chengchi University and is Taiwan’s former representative to the US.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations