The problems with the T16 support pillar of the Maokong Gondola will have a long-lasting negative effect on public confidence — regardless of whether the government has the pillar reinforced or moved to another location.
The Taipei City Government and the engineering and building organizations responsible for the cable car were unable to prevent the problems from arising, nor were they able to take decisive action after the issue came to light.
Their attempts at crisis management have been too passive, which is what caused the current situation.
If the Taipei City Government cannot come up with a convincing plan to strengthen the foundation of the pillar or erect a new pillar at another location, the public’s safety worries will not diminish.
Judging from the news reports that I have read, I believe that the engineers may have been overly confident and failed to conduct a geological investigation and sample drilling during the planning stage and during construction.
They also seem to have neglected the importance of a safety monitoring system during construction and after operations began.
They were therefore unable to produce reliable data after the problem with the T16 support pillar came to light.
When they discovered that the top soil under the T16 support pillar was shifting, the engineers were also unable to take emergency measures, such as installing drop panels for the foundations, using breakwater tribars to fill in the footings of the cable car and other measures to reinforce the foundation.
They also failed to carry out any follow-up safety evaluations, instead just allowing the situation to deteriorate.
This is difficult to understand and is very upsetting.
Nine times out of 10, the collapse of a slope will cause flooding. The majority of safety risks posed by collapsed slopes are also related to problems of surface water, groundwater and other geological problems.
The Taipei City Government has commissioned the four major engineering associations in Taiwan — the Taipei Professional Civil Engineers Association, the Taipei Structural Engineers Association, the Taipei Professional Geotechnical Engineers Association and the Taipei Soil and Water Conservation Professional Engineers Association — to jointly assess the stability and problems of the T16 support pillar.
That is a laudable decision based on respect for the specialized skills and knowledge of the members of these associations.
The only problem with this, however, is that hydraulic engineers and engineers who specialize in applied geology have not been invited to help with the assessments. Perhaps city government officials do not think that hydrology and geology are a major part of the problem.
Hydraulic engineers were also excluded from the safety evaluations on the collapsed section of the Orange Line of the Kaohsiung MRT last year and this year when then DPP was still in power.
Back then, I wrote to the China Times, urging the authorities to respect the specialized skills of hydraulic engineers and to include them in the process.
Now the KMT is in power. The expertise of hydraulic engineers is still not valued, which is very disturbing.
If the T16 support pillar of the Maokong Gondola had had a safety monitoring system for side slopes and structures from the start, then the data from that system could now be consulted for evaluations and we would not be in a situation in which various people are saying different things about the cable car’s problems.
This matter alone makes it difficult for those involved in the cable car’s construction to clear themselves of blame.
Automatic monitoring systems are more reliable than expert professionals.
All of the side slopes of the cable car’s tower foundations and other structures need automatic monitoring and video camera systems installed. Where such systems are in place, they should be strengthened.
In addition, the Beitou Gondola should be built with this in mind.
These systems should then be linked with the safety monitoring systems used during the operation of the Gondola and should be monitored daily.
The control room of the cable car could adopt a more open method of operation and the authorities could even consider building the control room near a coffee shop or lookout area, in addition to periodically releasing the results of safety tests. These measures could ease public concerns.
If the Maokong Gondola is to continue operating, standard operational procedures for crisis management must be improved. The same goes for the system for making public statements.
With politicians and the media asking so many questions about the cable car, the information released to the public and the way this information is provided must be convincing. Expert engineers should be responsible for this information, otherwise the situation will only get worse.
The evaluation reports under way from the four engineering associations should become public property and the Taipei City Government should consider putting the information on the Internet, where it can be easily accessed.
This information should be open to public scrutiny. This is the only way that the truth of the matter will become clear. When necessary, public hearings could also be held to collect ideas and opinions from a wider segment of society.
Day Ching Her is a civil and hydraulic engineer and is the founder and former chairman of the Taiwan Association of Hydraulic Engineers.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing