Is China an island of stability in the midst of the gathering global financial storm, or will it, too, soon be sucked into the vortex?
Chinese officials have said that the crisis that began in the US will not slow down long-planned reforms in the financial markets.
They insist that China will go ahead with plans to introduce margin trading, short selling and futures contracts on share prices.
But China slowed capital-account liberalization after the Asian financial crisis 10 years ago, so it is possible that the US’ troubles could make China more cautious.
China has played an important role in financing the US budget deficit in recent years, thanks to its effort to manage the yuan’s exchange rate against the dollar.
China does not want its large current-account surplus to cause the currency to overshoot on the upside, and it may now want to slow the yuan’s appreciation because of concern about the global economic slowdown.
If so, China would have to expand its foreign exchange reserves by another US$300 billion to US$400 billion, which would allow it to finance the large expansion in the US fiscal deficit.
Recent slight declines in the value of the yuan suggest that China’s exchange rate policy may be changing with the 20 percent appreciation of the currency since July 2005.
German Finance Minister Peer Steinbruck has said that the crisis will reduce US financial hegemony and create a more multipolar world.
The Sept. 26 edition of the China Daily carried an article by Steinbruck asking, “Is the Sun Setting on US Economic Supremacy?” It reviewed examples of how foreign investors have lost money in the US market and concluded: “The outbreak of the latest crisis shows that the neo-conservative revolution launched in the [1980s] has already come to an end.”
The article attributed the crisis to policies that “called on market forces to be given full play with the scrapping of government controls, especially on the financial market.”
Chinese officials have not yet echoed Steinbruck’s comments, but the US experience will naturally make them more suspicious of Western investment bankers and US-style regulation.
China has so far lost money on two of its major investments in Western financial firms (Morgan Stanley and Blackstone). It could have helped to contain the current crisis if it had accepted invitations to invest in Lehman Brothers, but given its previous losses on Wall Street, it declined.
As a result of concern about the global economy, the People’s Bank reduced interest rates two weeks ago and joined the coordinated global interest rate cut on Oct. 8 — the first time that China ever participated in a global monetary policy move.
The government also announced plans earlier this month to increase infrastructure spending by US$586 billion next year and in 2010.
The projected spending increases are equal to 15 percent of GDP, and are the largest that any country has undertaken so far in response to the financial crisis.
They demonstrate clearly that China is prepared to compensate for export weakness by stimulating domestic demand.
China must now take further action to bolster consumer spending, which slumped to only 36 percent of GDP last year from more than 50 percent during the 1980s, owing to the economy’s heavy dependence on exports and capital spending since the late 1990s.
The Chinese government’s goal will be to keep annual growth above 8 percent in order to generate sufficient employment to maintain social stability. It is currently also more sensitive to employment risks than usual, because several thousand small factories in the textile and toy sectors have closed this year as a result of the impact of rising labor costs and the appreciating yuan on profit margins.
China wants to shift from low value-added, labor-intensive industries such as textiles to higher value-added sectors such as electronics and capital goods. But it does not want to generate high levels of unemployment as this transition occurs.
China has the resources to cope with the current financial crisis. Foreign exchange reserves are an immense US$1.9 trillion. Booming tax receipts have provided the government with a fiscal surplus.
The critical issue has been policymakers’ willingness to act promptly before there is clear evidence of an economic downturn. The government’s stimulus package demonstrates that it is aware of the risks in the global economy and is prepared to act decisively.
The current crisis marks an important step in China’s evolution as a great economic power. China has been pursuing a policy of extreme Keynesianism at a time when Europe and the US are also undertaking massive interventions in their financial systems to prevent the current crisis from leading to a global financial collapse.
Therefore, there is a growing convergence between Chinese and G7 economic policy, born of the need to compensate for massive failures in both US financial regulation and monetary policy.
The US has been lobbying China for some time for economic policy changes aimed at stimulating domestic demand and open markets.
The irony is that, to compensate for a crisis that the US’ own policies have created in global financial markets, the US is now getting what it has long sought from China.
David Hale is chairman of David Hale Global Economics and a long-time analyst of China’s economic reform process.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.