Warming ties or hot air?
When Ma Ying jeou (馬英九) was elected president, the Western media hailed it as a significant step toward improved relations between Taiwan and China. Since the election, many articles have been written about how relations are warming and how ties between the two countries are at an all-time high. This could not be further from the truth.
If relations are really warming up, why does China still have more than 1,400 plus ballistic missiles aimed at Taiwan? Military spending in China hit a record high in the past year and will definitely increase again next year. China regularly holds military exercises that simulate an attack on Taiwan. Are these actions indicative of countries with warming ties?
Why does China continue to adamantly deny Taiwan access into any international organization, most notably the UN and the WHO? Ma bragged that by establishing direct cross-straight flights, the influx of 3,000 Chinese tourists a day would boost Taiwan’s faltering economy, as well as ease tensions across the Taiwan Strait. Where are all the Chinese tourists? They’re still in China.
The real numbers tell a different story. Since direct chartered flights started in mid-July, the average number of Chinese tourists a week has hovered around a paltry, penny-pinching 300. That’s about 43 tourists a day on average against Ma’s campaign promise of 3,000.
The problem with Ma and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is that their idea of improved and warming relations with China is nothing more than complete capitulation of all the democratic progress and development that Taiwan has fought for over the past eight years.
Of all the countries in the world, only one is openly hostile towards Taiwan. Only one country in the world has given itself the right to attack Taiwan by creating an insane and laughable law — the Anti-Secession Law — passed by nothing more than a rubberstamp congress. To think that the key to rescuing Taiwan’s economy and international standing lies in closer ties — and eventually possible reunification — with this country is not only ludicrous, but delusional.
The future of Taiwan must be one which is decided by Taiwanese themselves. Taiwan has developed into one of the most democratic countries in Asia where freedom of speech and human rights are sacrosanct. What does Taiwan have to gain from aligning itself with the most corrupt and most brainwashed country on the planet?
Earlier this year, Freedom House’s report ranked Taiwan 32nd out of 195 countries in terms of overall freedom of the press. China ranked far behind at 181. During the Beijing Olympics, the entire world witnessed what happens when ordinary citizens exercise their right to free speech in China — jail. Incarceration was followed by immediate deportation for foreigners, and one can only imagine what happened to the Chinese who were fearless enough to take a stand for human rights.
For Ma to think that China is the solution to all of Taiwan’s problems when it’s actually the cause shows his complete lack of understanding about Taiwan and the country where he is now sadly president.
What sane Taiwanese individual would choose to give up all of his or her rights as a free democratic citizen to become part of a communist country where citizens are fed propaganda and lies 24 hours a day?
If Ma and the KMT are so enthusiastic about returning to China, I suggest they take the initiative and go first before they run this country into the ground.
Eric Chang
Tainan City
Dual recognition?
I can’t work out why nations in the world are forced to choose between recognizing the government in Taipei or the government in Beijing.
Decisions made in Beijing are not law in Taipei and decisions made in Taipei are not law in Beijing. I see them as two separate independent nations that happen to share a common language, and at various times in the past, have been ruled by the same rulers.
There may come a time when once again they may — or may not — choose to become one. Unless and until this happens, why can’t Australia for instance have two embassies?
Luke Weyland
Sydney
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry