Last week, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) five grand justice nominees were unanimously approved by the legislature. Upon closer examination, every step of the process, — from the nominations by Ma to the legislative review and approval — was performed in a slipshod manner. Appointing five grand justices with eight-year terms so hastily is very unfavorable to the nation’s constitutional development and human rights protection.
The government followed old routines and did not improve upon the nomination and approval procedures. Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) presided over a committee to recommend several candidates from Ma’s nominees. The Presidential Office only had rough information about all the possible candidates, and it even failed to thoroughly review and check the resumes and profiles of each candidate.
Not only did the committee fail to collect detailed information about the candidates, but Ma also seems not to have obtained a deeper understanding of each nominee.
It appears Ma wanted to take advantage of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) legislative majority so that his grand justice nominees could be quickly approved. Just as expected, the legislature was very cooperative and completed the entire procedure very quickly. The haste of these appointments deprived all civic groups and individuals of the opportunity to review and express their opinions about each nominee. This is a manifestation of an authoritarian regime that violates the principles of democracy.
By the time the Presidential Office submitted the official list of Ma’s nominees to the legislature, the five had basically already passed the review. Procedurally and practically, the KMT-controlled legislature intended to go easy on them.
The legislature only arranged one meeting to review all five nominations, and because of a lack of quorum, the meeting had to be postponed for an hour. Each nominee received less than an hour of questioning on average. Moreover, as all five nominees were questioned together and the lawmakers only asked questions to certain nominees, it was hard for the other nominees to express their viewpoints on various issues such as constitutional politics, human rights and legislation.
After observing the process, the Civic Alliance to Supervise Nominations for Grand Justices said in its report that the KMT legislators performed very poorly during the review meeting, with 55 percent of questions deviating from the topic at hand, 54 percent lacking substance and 46 percent being substandard.
The nominees’ performance in answering the questions in this slipshod question-and-answer session exposed serious problems, too. For example, all the nominees showed a lack of understanding of gender mainstreaming and they seemed to lack any substantial understanding of the definition of sexual harassment.
In addition, some nominees chose to use roundabout and unclear wording in their replies to questions regarding conflicts of interest, implying they had no intention of avoiding such situations.
Two days after the committee hastily finished the review, the nominations were submitted to the legislature for approval. Despite a boycott of the vote by Democratic Progressive Party lawmakers, the KMT majority followed the party whip and gave a green light to each nominee.
We have no confidence in any of the grand justices appointed through such a careless, slipshod process.
Chiu Hei-yuan is chairman of the Civic Alliance to Supervise Nominations for Grand Justices.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and