Pssst. Don’t spread it around too much, because there’s still a month to go and I don’t want to jinx things — but substance is in this year. You, I know, think US presidential elections are always decided by silly or superficial or out-and-out false representations and aspersions. Former US vice president Al Gore sighed too much in a debate and wasn’t the sort of fellow you’d like to have a beer with. US President George W Bush never sighed once, as far as anyone could tell, and was the sort you’d like to have a beer with (even though he didn’t drink beer). Senator John Kerry seemed so French and effete. He windsurfed. And he didn’t save all those men during the Vietnam War.
Little glimmers of substance have usually shown through. In 2004, for instance, a still-significant percentage of US voters remained jittery about a second large-scale terrorist attack on US soil. Bush ran as the man who had prevented that from happening and argued that he was more trustworthy on this matter than Kerry. And former US president Bill Clinton withstood an intensive barrage of over-the-top attacks and stayed focused on the economy.
Superficialities and attacks, though, usually dominate. In fact, more than a few liberals have spent the last four years trying to persuade Democrats to be every bit as superficial and nasty as the Republicans are at election time. But this year, something feels different. Voters are actually paying closer attention to issues.
It is the result, no doubt, of the US being in terrible shape right now. It tends to focus the mind. The economy is terrible. The stock market is terrible. Indicators of general societal well-being, like healthcare and pensions, are terrible. Our standing in the world is terrible. The conditions in Afghanistan are terrible. The situation in Iraq is improved but was so terrible for so long that people just basically want out.
We are a country in decline. The decline is the result of the policies of the last eight years. No candidate for president can utter the sentence “we are a country in decline.” The US’ central myth about itself is that, unlike Rome or Austria-Hungary or an earlier Britain, we are impervious to time’s vicissitudes and will always be numero uno. People now are worried that underneath that bravado, maybe we won’t be.
And so, substance matters. The public responses to the financial meltdown and the first two debates make this evident.
When the Wall Street crisis hit, Senator John McCain erupted with lots of bluster about how he was going to crack down on the fatcats and the greed heads. He “suspended” his campaign to return to Washington to handle the problem. He called Senator Barack Obama green and a hypocrite. In other words, he was superficial and aggressive in precisely the way that usually works in presidential campaigns. But he lost the argument — polls before the Wall Street crisis showed him closing the gap with Obama on the question of who can better handle the economy. That gap is now wider than ever.
Obama, by contrast, stayed calm, didn’t attack McCain’s stunt and at press conferences listed the specific items he needed to see in the bail-out bill. He was talking with congressional leaders and the Treasury secretary about these substantive points. The distinction between the two was clear.
Likewise with the debates. McCain has more zingers and one-liners than Obama and generally speaking is the aggressor. And Alaska Governor Sarah Palin had far more of a folksy approach than Senator Joe Biden did. One-liners, aggression and emotive warmth are supposed to win these contests, we are told. But polls shows that voters think Obama and Biden won the debates.
The Republicans can’t win on substance. Most of their positions are too unpopular. They know this, and this is why they lie, like Palin did during her debate, about leading the state of Alaska to divest of investments that could benefit the Sudanese government. It turns out that her administration opposed such divestment when it mattered and that she finally told a legislator or two she was for it — after it was too late for the legislature to act.
So in this closing month, they will do what they know how to do. Republican operatives told the Washington Post that they will spend the remaining days attacking Obama’s character. Meanwhile, independent conservative groups are bound to spread all manner of disinformation.
We’ve seen lies like these work before. But what we haven’t seen before is basically 80 percent of US adults feeling this miserably about their country. If there’s ever going to be a circumstance when voters stay focused on the things that matter, this ought to be it.
Michael Tomasky is editor of Guardian America.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and