Judging from the statements issued by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) during her visit to Washington and the low profile she has taken in meeting US officials, it is not very difficult to see what she is trying to achieve.
Tsai wants to create a new image for the DPP. Tsai has on several occasions said that the DPP needs a generational change to correct some of the mistakes from the past eight years, to build a new political approach and to establish a better way of supervising the government.
With the severe damage to the DPP caused by the former first family’s alleged money laundering, US officials may be gradually losing confidence in the deepening of Taiwan’s democracy. They may even believe that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) will be in power for the long term, and so Tsai feels she must display a new style of leadership when dealing with the US.
Over the past eight years, the US has been dissatisfied with delays in policy-making that have resulted from infighting between the government and opposition in Taiwan. In particular, the US is deeply frustrated by the delay in arms purchases agreed to by US President George W. Bush in April 2001. Tsai is promoting a calmer and more rational approach to politics that aims to convince the US that something has changed.
She wants to alert the US to the fact that they must be on their guard toward the current administration’s excessive bias toward China.
The US is very pleased with the renewed talks between China and Taiwan that have resulted from President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) repeated gestures of goodwill in the three months since his inauguration.
If, however, this satisfaction is only founded on US national interests — that Taiwan will be fine in the short term so it will not interfere with the US’ need for China in dealing with Iraq, the Korean Peninsula and maybe even Georgia — then this will carry a long-term cost and the relationship between the US, China and Taiwan will become even more skewed.
In particular, some officials in the administration of US President George W. Bush disliked the way former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) administration handled the referendum issue. Because of this and warming relations between the US and China, one can frequently hear it said in Washington: “Taiwan is no longer seen by the US as a strategic asset.”
This may affect the foreign policy strategists of the US presidential candidates, and Tsai should use this visit to firmly express Taiwan’s concerns and position.
She also wants to show the US that the DPP has found a new sense of responsibility toward US-Taiwanese relations. The Bush administration’s biggest problem with the DPP’s time in government is that it manipulated elections and domestic politics without regard to US concerns.
Because Tsai has never stood in local or national elections — she has only been a DPP legislator at large — she is less restricted by electoral concerns. At the same time, she stresses that the DPP will support disadvantaged groups and the working class while supervising the government’s economic, cross-strait and diplomatic policies.
The US must have some expectations of Tsai with her clean image and new pragmatism. Although Tsai must not shrink back from attempts to safeguard Taiwan’s sovereignty during this visit, she has also promised to rebuild US-DPP relations. This move will at least let the US understand that with the DPP’s new leadership there is also a shift in the party’s international outlook.
Liu Shih-chung is a political commentator.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs