In international athletic competitions, the connection between winning medals and national pride has become deeply ingrained in the minds of athletes and sports fans. This is true in both the East and the West.
However, more developed democracies do not place such an emphasis on the connection between sports and national dignity and honor. Instead, they emphasize the universal values of sport such as fair competition, entertainment, health, fitness and encouragement of the human spirit.
Judging things in this light, we can see that Taiwanese sports lovers have managed to overcome the mindset that sport acts merely in the service of the glory and honor of a nation.
During the Olympic Games, Taiwanese baseball player Chang Tai-shan (張泰山) was banned from competing after testing positive in a drug test. This was a huge blow to the strength of Taiwan’s Olympic team. Chang later apologized in the media, saying the chemicals found in his system were leftover medicine taken to help conceive a child.
Before and after Chang made his apology, Taiwanese media did not say he had disgraced the nation and comforted him instead. In stark contrast, when China’s star track athlete Liu Xiang (劉翔) pulled out of a hurdles heat because of a leg injury, many people criticized him on the Internet, giving him nicknames like “Liu the quitter.”
The gold medal Liu could have won would have been very significant for China. Huge expectations were placed on his shoulders, most probably because athletes from Asian nations have never excelled in track and field events. For the Chinese, that gold medal would have meant a great deal in breaking Western hegemony and in erasing the shame the Chinese feel they have been subjected to as a nation.
The hate for Japan that Taiwanese were taught during the early days of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) authoritarian rule gradually waned as the nation’s democracy matured. Nationalistic ideas have weakened and many Taiwanese youth practically worship Japan and Japanese culture.
I have asked many of my students whether they would support Japan or South Korea in a baseball match. The answer from every single one was “Japan.” Even a senior sports commentator who was born in China and moved to Taiwan at a young age said on air: “I can handle Taiwan losing in baseball to Japan, but definitely not to South Korea.”
Now let us look at China. Chinese supporters wanted South Korea to defeat Japan in Olympic competitions because of a “Japanese hate complex” they developed over the experiences of World War II. In each event involving Japanese athletes, Chinese supporters cheered for Japan’s opponents and booed the Japanese team. Such behavior only serves to further ingrain feelings of national pride and past hostility between nations.
However, the Beijing Games also saw some Chinese leaving messages on the Internet that Liu should not be blamed for sports serving political ends. Volunteers at the Olympics said they were shocked and deeply moved by the Japanese team’s spirit when they witnessed Japan’s female soccer team bow to the crowd after losing, even after being booed.
Opinions that go against the grain in China are a rarity, even on the Internet, and if this type of independent thinking can develop further, it would prove to be the most precious return China would receive on the huge amount of money it invested in hosting the Games.
Chiang Wen-yu is an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of Linguistics at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs