What comes out of the nest?
As the Beijing Olympics come to an end, it is clear that China has not only achieved the goals it set but also repelled what it saw as harmful. The hopes for national glory, champions, gold medals and even t he weather were realized.
Concerns for human rights violations, boycotts, protests, sabotage and even air pollution were kept under control. The “One World, One Dream” has been defined by Beijing and carried out by Beijing with Chinese characteristics.
Nevertheless, the “free world” is still asking what China will be after the Olympics. China hands are still debating whether China is a strategic partner, or a competitor, or both.
Top policymakers in Washington are still planning how to make China a responsible stakeholder. The government in Taiwan is still evaluating whether China’s goodwill is for real; Taiwanese are waiting to see whether there will be more tourists or investments coming from China.
All are still asking and asking what will come out of the nest.
What happened in the Bird’s Nest has proved that China not only has a clear goal but also uses specific tactics to form a home advantage to achieve the objectives it set — be it in the sports arena or political arena.
With the closing ceremony of the Games, maybe it’s time for the other stakeholders to come up with a grand strategy and take concrete action to win the next round of competition.
JOHNWAY CHEN
Taipei
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs