Taiwanese food-making tycoon Wei Ing-chou’s (魏應州) warning last week about the challenges facing the Chinese economy was hardly music to the ears of a government that has made cross-strait trade deregulation a cornerstone of its policy.
In a front-page story by the Chinese-language Economic Daily News on Tuesday, Wei — chairman of Tingyi (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp (康師傅控股), China’s biggest instant noodle maker and owner of the Master Kang brand — said that in a world economy hit by the US subprime mortgage crisis, “China’s economy will be facing the biggest changes in the next two to three years.”
Wei also said in the interview that in view of this changing environment, companies should pay particular attention to financial risk control and suggested that keeping “cash on hand” would be the best strategy for companies.
Wei’s warning is not an isolated call.
On Thursday, Gordon Chang (章家敦), the Chinese-American author of the 2001 book titled The Coming Collapse of China, said in a New York speech that China was “due for a post-Olympic recession.”
Chang also warned Taiwanese against investing in China, especially in its financial markets, over the next two to three years or even the next half-decade, the Central News Agency reported.
However, all the cross-trade policies unveiled by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office in May seem to downplay or even overlook the fact that China’s economic outlook is increasingly challenging in terms of growth creation and inflation control.
On Thursday, the government scrapped a regulation banning companies with more than 20 percent Chinese equity stake from listing on the nation’s stock markets. At the same time, it removed the prohibition on companies with 40 percent or more of their net assets invested in China from listing in Taiwan. The administration also agreed to allow companies to sell shares in Taiwan and use the proceeds for investment across the Strait.
No one in this country would oppose a modest degree of financial liberalization aimed at broadening domestic capital markets and attracting more foreign fund inflow — as long as the regulators have established adequate measures to safeguard shareholders’ interests and the economy as a whole.
The government has to realize that the best policy for the nation’s export-oriented economy is one that targets global markets — not just one focused on China, where many firms are already struggling to cope with a rising Chinese yuan, a reduction in export rebates, tightening loans and rising labor costs.
At this point, there is little relief in sight for the Taiwanese economy. The past week saw the stock market falling 3.2 percent after rising 6.1 percent a week earlier, making it the region’s worst performer.
The reasons are clear enough, given the latest slew of economic data: Leading indicators were flat in June for the second straight month, suggesting that the economic slowdown would persist; the latest consumer confidence poll showed the public had become more bearish last month compared with the previous month; several high-tech companies had issued conservative guidance on business prospects in the second half of the year.
Faced with the current market correction, investors need positive and constructive action from the government to boost confidence. Whether the market could regain its upward momentum would be dependent on macroeconomic factors, including global oil price fluctuations and their implications on corporate profits — not the Chinese economy alone.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under