President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has retracted all defamation lawsuits filed under his own name during the presidential campaign, saying he wanted to heal the social rift that opened up during the campaign. However, Ma has been minister of justice, so he should be able to look at defamation from a judicial reform perspective and propose an amendment to the Criminal Code (刑法) that decriminalizes defamation, putting an end to a waste of judicial resources.
Article 310 of the Criminal Code states: “A person who points out or circulates a fact that will injure the reputation of another with intent that it be communicated to the public commits the offense of defamation and shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than one year, detention, or a fine of not more than NT$500. A person who by circulating a writing or drawing commits an offense specified in the preceding paragraph shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than two years, detention, or a fine of not more than NT$1,000. A person who can prove the truth of the defamatory fact shall not be punished for the offense of defamation unless the fact concerns private life and is of no public concern.”
Defamation lawsuits are often the preserve of celebrities, as ordinary people are seldom defamed publicly. The general public rarely has the chance of being defamed, and if it does occur, judges tend to request that the cases be settled out of court to avoid wasting time. The purpose of such lawsuits seems to be to provide tabloids with gossip, and going to court often only aggravates the situation.
Unfortunately, in Taiwan’s negative campaign culture, almost any material can be legally challenged. Whether a report is true or not, the candidate under attack will file a defamation lawsuit to avoid the impression of a tacit admission. Thus, a lawsuit is aimed at proving one’s innocence, showing that one doesn’t fear an investigation and consolidating support. Since such attacks carry a legal penalty, why do so many challenge the law?
The reason is simple: Big gains come at small costs. Defamation carries a light penalty and a candidate will almost never be sentenced. Public insults will at the most result in a short detention or a fine. The penalty for defamation is imprisonment up to one year, and for aggravated defamation it is imprisonment up to two years, while those who violate the Election and Recall Act (選舉罷免法) may be punished with imprisonment for up to five years. Violations with short-term penalties can be converted into fines or probation. A candidate will not go to jail for defamation and will have a brighter political future. No wonder Taiwan’s politicians defame each other.
There are countless defamation lawsuits. Some call them a judicial sideshow to elections that attracts little attention afterward. Prosecutors, judges and even the parties involved tend to ignore them. Those who lose an election often withdraw from politics and do not appear in court. Most winners no longer care about a lawsuit, and may retract it to set a good example. “Settling a defamation suit by leaving it unsettled” has become an unwritten law in Taiwan’s elections.
A defamation lawsuit has become the cheapest tool for a politician to promote himself. Such lawsuits waste enormous judicial resources. Even if a defendant is found guilty, the ruling cannot highlight the judiciary’s function to arrest criminals and expose their crimes, and instead it will use up resources that should be used to investigate more serious crimes. If defamation is decriminalized, how should we then deal with such cases? It is simple: File a civil lawsuit for damage to one’s reputation. Then the parties involved will have to pay the legal fees themselves.
Jan Shou-jung is a former legislative assistant.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry